Suppose $D^kf$ is weak derivative of $f$ of order $k$ on a domain $U \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$. Let $V$ be any open connected subset of U. Is it true that $D^k(f\chi_V)=(D^kf)\chi_V$?
2026-03-26 19:18:49.1774552729
Weak derivative of restriction and restriction of weak derivative
85 Views Asked by user117449 https://math.techqa.club/user/user117449/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in SOBOLEV-SPACES
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- $\mbox{Cap}_p$-measurability
- If $u\in W^{1,p}(\Omega )$ is s.t. $\nabla u=0$ then $u$ is constant a.e.
- Weak formulation of Robin boundary condition problem
- Variational Formulation - inhomogeneous Neumann boundary
- Why the Sobolev space $W^{1,2}(M,N)$ weak-sequencially closed in $W^{1,2}(\mathbb R^K)$?
- Sobolev space $H^s(Q)$ is Hilbert
- Duhamel's principle for heat equation.
- How to define discrete Sobolev dual norm so that it can be computed?
- Weakly sequentially continuous maps
Related Questions in WEAK-DERIVATIVES
- Existence and uniqueness of weak solutions to the homogeneous biharmonic equation.
- Is the square of an $H^1$ function also $H^1$?
- Regularity of the Divergence of Weak Solutions to Elliptic PDEs
- Recovering classical solution from weak one for the Laplace equation
- Exercise on first and second order derivative in sense of distributions.
- Radon-Nikodym derivative of discrete measure
- $\mathbb{1}_{B_1(0)}$ doesn't have a $\partial_{x_i}$weak derivative in $\mathbb{R}^n$
- Ito's formula for merely continuous functions
- Sobolev spaces on different domains
- Why the generalized derivatives defined? Why was it needed?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
No. This is not true, even for $k = 1$.
Formally, if you apply Leibniz formula, you get $D^1 (f \chi_V) = (D^1 f) \chi_V + f (D^1 \chi_V)$. So, with respect to your formula, there is a supplementary term. You could argue that, since $\chi_V$ is locally constant, $D^1 \chi_V = 0$. But this is not the case, the (weak) derivative of $\chi_V$ contains a singular term on the boundary of $V$.
Take $n = 1$, $U = \mathbb{R}$ and say $f(x) = 1$ everywhere to make things very simple. Also, take $V = (0,1)$. On the one hand $(D^1 f) \chi_V = 0$ because $D^1 f = 0$. On the other hand, since $f \chi_V = \chi_V$, $D^1(f\chi_V) = D^1(\chi_V) = \delta_{x=0} - \delta_{x=1}$ in $\mathcal{D}'(\mathbb{R})$.