Let $(P, \leq)$ be a partially ordered set with an order reversing involution $^c$ i.e. $x\leq y\Rightarrow y^c\leq x^c$.
A subset $I$ of $P$ is a weak ideal, if the following conditions hold:
- for any $x\in P$, either $x\in I$ or $x^c\in I$.
- for every $x \in I$, any $y\in P$ and $y \le x$ implies that $y\in I$.
A filter $J$ of $P$ is a set of $P$ with following properties:
- for any $x\in P$, either $x\in J$ or $x^c\in J$.
- for every $y \in J$, any $x\in P$ and $y \le x$ implies that $x\in J$.
In particular I am interested in the case $P$ is the power set of a finite set. It seems that in this case every weak ideal is filter and vice versa.
Or we need some conditions to add to $P$ in order to have an equivalent definitions.
If $P$ is the power set of a finite set $X$ of size $n$ we can define $I$ to be all subsets of size $\lfloor \frac{n}{2}\rfloor $ or less. This is a weak ideal (if $^c$ is complementation) as we cannot have two disjoint sets $x$ and $x^c$ both of size $> \lfloor \frac{n}{2}\rfloor $, while their union is size $n$.
And a set that is a subset of a "small" set is also small.
But his $I$ is not a (weak) filter: Any filter contains $X$ and that is not in $I$. So ideals need not be filters, nor the other way around.
What does hold is that the notions are dual:
This follows from $x \to x^c$ being an order reversing involution. So we can always reduce theorems on filters to dual theorems on ideals and vice versa.