Wikipedia says to use $\wedge$ in set-builder notation like $\{x \,:\, x > 3 \wedge x \neq 10\}$. However, I prefer to merely seperate predicates by a comma. Which notation is more common?
2026-05-16 05:27:25.1778909245
On
$\wedge$ in set builder notation
456 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
2
There are 2 best solutions below
1
On
Actually, the Wikipedia article I found uses both:
$$ \{ x \mid x \in \Bbb R \land x > 0 \} \quad\text{and}\quad \{ p/q \mid p,q \in \Bbb Z, q \neq 0 \} $$
I would suggest the former, because of the (possible) confusion that can arise in the latter example, using the comma to signify two things:
Separating two or several variables that satisfy the same criterion ($p,q \in \Bbb Z$).
Separating two clauses.
Hence, writing
$$\{ p/q \mid p,q \in \Bbb Z \land q \neq 0 \} $$
is logically consistent with what all the predicates specify together.
It may not be clear whether a comma signifies and or or. The reason it is complicated is because of the comma's use and meanings in different places: $x = 2,3$ means or, but $x\in \mathbb{R}, x>3$ may be and. So in a more ambiguous case or when your audience is unfamiliar with your notation, you should explicitly state (at least at first) what you mean, or use unambiguous notation.