Weierstrass elliptic functions and ordinary differential equations

411 Views Asked by At

I am studying Elliptic functions for a University project with a particular focus on Weierstrass's theory. For the past few weeks I have been studying various basic properties of the $\wp$ function (the majority of the Elliptic functions section in Whittaker and Watson). Finally, I have come to the point were I want to choose a particular topic.

Ideally, I don't want my paper to become just a list of standard theorems that can already be found in the standard references so I have been trying to find something interesting and challenging. In searching for a project idea, I found that according to wikipedia:

"Genus one solutions of ordinary differential equations can be written in terms of Weierstrass's elliptic functions"

This sounds very attractive to me but I have been unable to find references to unpack exactly what is meant. Does a genus 1 ODE mean one whose associated curve is genus 1? If any one could explain the above statement and provide some references to further pursue this strain of knowledge I would be very grateful.

Thanks

1

There are 1 best solutions below

0
On

I think this simply means the following: let $P(X,Y)\in\mathbb C[X,Y]$. This defines an algebraic curve $P(X,Y) = 0$, and it also defines a differential equation $P(f,f') = 0$. A solution to the differential equation automatically defines a (local) parameterization of the algebraic curve by $t\mapsto (f(t), f'(t))$.

The Weierstrass $\wp$-function for a given lattice $\Lambda$ satisfies such a differential equation:

$$\wp'(z)^2 = 4\wp(z)^3 - g_2\wp(z) - g_3$$

for some $g_2, g_3\in\mathbb C$, where $Y^2 = 4X^3 - g_2X - g_3$ defines a non-singular curve of genus 1, i.e. an elliptic curve.

The statement you are asking about concerns the converse: whenever $P$ defines an elliptic curve, the differential equation $P(f,f') = 0$ is solved by a Weierstrass $\wp$-function for some lattice. This is Abel's inversion problem from 1827.

Much of this material can be found in chapter 6 of Silverman's beautiful The Arithmetic of Elliptic Curves, but it states this specific theorem without a proof. It does go into detail about another ingredient, how to transform any plane equation defining an elliptic curve into Weierstrass form: $Y^2 = X^3 + aX + b$, and more generally how to obtain this form for any elliptic curve, which is the form of the differential equation satisfied by Weierstrass $\wp$-functions.

Some places where the inversion theorem is proved:

  • In chapter 6 of Knapp's Elliptic Curves this is proved explicitly through elliptic integrals.

  • In 1.4 of A First Course in Modular Forms by Diamond and Shurman (and in the other references below) this is proved, how else, using modular forms.

  • In the classics on modular forms by Shimura, in 4.2, and by Serre, chapter VII.

  • Finally, proofs can be found in the excellent and free, ever evolving lecture notes by Milne, on Modular Forms and in his very affordable book on Elliptic Curves as theorem 3.10.