I recently thought of this problem and have made very little progress. I conjecture that $\pi_1(\mathbb{R}^2\setminus \mathbb{Q}^2)$ is the biggest possible such group, in the sense that every other group of this form is isomorphic to a subgroup of it, but I have no idea how to justify this. Is classifying these groups even possible? Do these groups always have to be free?
2026-04-23 02:17:15.1776910635
What are the isomorphism classes of $\pi_1(\mathbb{R}^2\setminus C)$ where $C$ ranges over all countable subsets of $\mathbb{R}^2$?
444 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GENERAL-TOPOLOGY
- Is every non-locally compact metric space totally disconnected?
- Let X be a topological space and let A be a subset of X
- Continuity, preimage of an open set of $\mathbb R^2$
- Question on minimizing the infimum distance of a point from a non compact set
- Is hedgehog of countable spininess separable space?
- Nonclosed set in $ \mathbb{R}^2 $
- I cannot understand that $\mathfrak{O} := \{\{\}, \{1\}, \{1, 2\}, \{3\}, \{1, 3\}, \{1, 2, 3\}\}$ is a topology on the set $\{1, 2, 3\}$.
- If for every continuous function $\phi$, the function $\phi \circ f$ is continuous, then $f$ is continuous.
- Defining a homotopy on an annulus
- Triangle inequality for metric space where the metric is angles between vectors
Related Questions in GROUP-THEORY
- What is the intersection of the vertices of a face of a simplicial complex?
- Group with order $pq$ has subgroups of order $p$ and $q$
- How to construct a group whose "size" grows between polynomially and exponentially.
- Conjugacy class formula
- $G$ abelian when $Z(G)$ is a proper subset of $G$?
- A group of order 189 is not simple
- Minimal dimension needed for linearization of group action
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
- subgroups that contain a normal subgroup is also normal
- Could anyone give an **example** that a problem that can be solved by creating a new group?
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-TOPOLOGY
- How to compute homology group of $S^1 \times S^n$
- the degree of a map from $S^2$ to $S^2$
- Show $f$ and $g$ are both homeomorphism mapping of $T^2$ but $f$ is not homotopy equivalent with $g.$
- Chain homotopy on linear chains: confusion from Hatcher's book
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Are these cycles boundaries?
- a problem related with path lifting property
- Bott and Tu exercise 6.5 - Reducing the structure group of a vector bundle to $O(n)$
- Cohomology groups of a torus minus a finite number of disjoint open disks
- CW-structure on $S^n$ and orientations
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Recall that a Peano continuum is a compact connected and locally connected metrizable topological space. Equivalently, it is the image of a continuous map of $[0,1]$ to a metrizable space. For a subset $X\subset S^2$ I will denote the complement $S^2-X$ as $X^c$.
Consider $A$, a Peano continuum in $S^2$. I will denote $U_i$, $i\in I$, the components of $A^c$. Since $A$ is connected, each $U_i$ is simply-connected. In particular, it is conformal to the unit disk $\Delta$. It is known that the Riemann mapping $f_i: \Delta\to U_i$ extends to a continuous map
$$F_i: cl(\Delta)\to cl(U_i)$$ (this is the Caratheodory-Torhorst extension theorem, see my answer here). Therefore, given a point $b_i\in U_i$ and $f_i$ sending $0\in \Delta$ to $b_i$, we define $r_i: U_i-\{b_i\}\to \partial U_i$ by composing $$ F_i\circ R_i \circ f_i^{-1} $$ where $R_i: \Delta- \{0\}\to S^1=\partial \Delta$ is the radial projection. One verifies that the map $r_i$ extends continuously (by the identity) to $\partial U_i$.
Proof. Combine the retractions $r_i: cl(U_i)- \{b_i\}\to \partial U_i$ defined above. Extend to the rest of $A$ by the identity map. (Use local connectivity of $A$ to check that the resulting map is continuous along $A$.) $\square$
Remark. If you only want to understand examples such as when $A$ is the Hawaiian Earrings, you can construct a retraction $r$ directly without need for any deep extension theorems.
Proof. For each $U_i$ pick a point $b_i\in C\cap U_i$. Set $B=\{b_i: i\in I\}$. The homomorphism $\pi_1(A)\to \pi_1(B^c)$ factors as $$ \pi_1(A)\to \pi_1(C^c) \to \pi_1(B^c). $$ Now, the claim follows from Corollary 1. $\square$
Proof. Observe that, by density, $C$ has nonempty intersection with each component of $A^c$. Now, the claim follows from Corollary 2. $\square$
Recall that for any two dense countable subsets $X, Y\subset E^n$ there is a homeomorphism (actually, one can even find a diffeomorphism) of pairs $(E^n,X)\to (E^n,Y)$. (This is Brouwer's theorem, see my answer here.) In particular, for $n=2$, we have $\pi_1(E^2-X)\cong \pi_1(E^2-Y)$.
In particular, for every dense countable subset $X\subset E^2$, we have $\pi_1(E^2-X)\cong \pi_1({\mathbb R}^2 - {\mathbb Q}^2)$.
Proof. Start with the Hawaiian earrings $A=E\subset E^2$. Take a dense countable subset $C\subset A^c$ containing the point $\infty$. Now, apply Corollary 3 and obtain a monomorphism $\pi_1(E)\to \pi_1(E^2 - C)$. $\square$
What's more, by the same argument we obtain:
Remark. With more work one can remove the nowhere dense assumption.
Now, for an arbitrary countable subset $Y\subset E^2$, its complement $E^2-Y$ can be represented as a union of all Peano continua $A_\alpha, \alpha\in J$, in $E^2-Y$, forming a direct system. Therefore,
$$ \pi_1(E^2-Y)\cong \lim_{\alpha\in J} \pi_1(A_\alpha) $$ (the direct limit). As noted above, every group $\pi_1(A_\alpha)$ embeds in $\pi_1({\mathbb R}^2 - {\mathbb Q}^2)$. Maybe from this one can construct a monomorphism $$ \pi_1(E^2-Y) \to \pi_1({\mathbb R}^2 - {\mathbb Q}^2). $$ I do not see how to do this at the moment. (But maybe I am missing something simple.)
In any case, as far as I am concerned, classical algebro-topological invariants such as homotopy groups and singular homology, were designed for "nice" topological spaces. For spaces such as complements to arbitrary countable subsets of $E^2$ one should use other invariants. In particular, the "classification" question for their fundamental groups is hopeless. It reminds me of the joke that the classification of mathematical problems as linear and nonlinear is like classification of the Universe as bananas and non-bananas.