Let $X$ be a bisimplicial set: that means that $X$ is a simplicial object in simplicial sets. Let $\Delta^n$ be the collection of simplicial sets given by $$ \Delta^n(m):=\Delta(m,n), $$ so we could say $\Delta^n:=\Delta(\underline{\phantom m}, n)$. How would I simply describe $$ |X|=\int^{n\in\Delta}\Delta^n\otimes X_n $$ as a simplicial set? In particular, what is the set of simplices $|X|_n$ for each $n$?
2026-04-25 16:56:14.1777136174
What are the simplicies?
157 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in CATEGORY-THEORY
- (From Awodey)$\sf C \cong D$ be equivalent categories then $\sf C$ has binary products if and only if $\sf D$ does.
- Continuous functor for a Grothendieck topology
- Showing that initial object is also terminal in preadditive category
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- What concept does a natural transformation between two functors between two monoids viewed as categories correspond to?
- Please explain Mac Lane notation on page 48
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Terminal object for Prin(X,G) (principal $G$-bundles)
- Show that a functor which preserves colimits has a right adjoint
- Show that a certain functor preserves colimits and finite limits by verifying it on the stalks of sheaves
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I'm assuming that in $\Delta^n\otimes X_n$ the tensor product is the ordinary product, as it is on nLab.
This functor is a colimit, and as a colimit, I think you'll struggle to say anything interesting about its simplices except by just taking the construction of the colimit as a coequalizer, and bashing it out.
So let's do that. Taking the definition gives you that $i$-simplices of $|X|$ are the quotient of the set of all pairs $(a :i\to n, b_n)$ of $i$-simplices of $\Delta^n\times X_n$ by the smallest equivalence relation generated by $(a,f^*b_m)\sim (f\circ a,b_m)$ where $b_m\in X_m(i)$ and $f:n\to m$ is a morphism in $\Delta$.
Note then that we always have $(a,b_n) \sim (\mathrm{id}_i,a^*b_n)$. Thus the $i$ simplices will be $X_i(i)$ for all $i$. I assume therefore that $|X|$ should be the composite of $X$ with the diagonal functor $D:\Delta^{\text{op}}\to \Delta^{\text{op}}\times \Delta^{\text{op}}$.
To prove this, we could do the following $$ \newcommand\of[1]{\left({#1}\right)} \newcommand\Set{\mathbf{Set}} \newcommand\sSet{\mathbf{sSet}} \begin{align} \sSet(|X|,S) &= \sSet\of{ \int^{n\in\Delta} \Delta^n\times X_n ,S } \\ &= \int_{n\in\Delta} \sSet(\Delta^n\times X_n,S) \\ &= \int_{n\in\Delta} \int_{m\in\Delta} \Set\of{ X_n(m)\times \Delta(m,n), S(m) } \\ &= \int_{n\in\Delta} \int_{m\in\Delta} \Set\of{ \Delta(m,n), \Set\of{ X_n(m), S(m) } } \\ &= \int_{n\in\Delta} \Set\of{ X_n(n), S(n) } \\ &= \sSet(X\circ D,S). \end{align} $$