I asked Wolfram Alpha to tell me the fundamental unit of $\mathbb{Z}[\root 3 \of 2]$, it replied $1 - \root 3 \of 2$. Then I tried asking it for $(1 - \root 3 \of 2)^n$ for $-5 \leq n \leq 5$. If I run $n$ over all the integers, does that give me all the units of this domain? Or does this give me some of the units and some non-units?
2026-03-29 12:41:04.1774788064
What are the units in $\mathbb{Z}[\root 3 \of 2]$?
1.3k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-NUMBER-THEORY
- Splitting of a prime in a number field
- algebraic integers of $x^4 -10x^2 +1$
- Writing fractions in number fields with coprime numerator and denominator
- Tensor product commutes with infinite products
- Introduction to jacobi modular forms
- Inclusions in tensor products
- Find the degree of the algebraic numbers
- Exercise 15.10 in Cox's Book (first part)
- Direct product and absolut norm
- Splitting of primes in a Galois extension
Related Questions in CUBICS
- Roots of a complex equation
- Cubic surfaces and 27 lines
- Polynomial Equation Problem with Complex Roots
- Cubic Discriminant
- Is it always possible to rearrange an equation desirably?
- Form an equation whose roots are $(a-b)^2,(b-c)^2,(c-a)^2.$
- if $x^3 + px^2+qx+r = 0$ has three real roots, show that $p^2 \ge 3q$
- The complex equation $x^3 = 9 + 46i$ has a solution of the form $a + bi$ where $a,b\in \mathbb Z$. Find the value of $a^3 + b^3$
- Roots of $z^3 + 3iz^2 + 3z + i = 0$?
- If the roots of the cubic equation $ax^3+bx^2+cx+d=0$ are equal, can one then establish a relationship between $a, b, c, d$?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
As I'm filling in the gaps in my answer I see that it has become very, very similar to sans answer. This is in no way an attempt to top that wonderful and very comprehensive answer: I've decided to still post this because I felt it would be a shame to let the time I've put into this answer go to waste. If it would be better to remove this answer because it is a duplicate (or for whatever other reason), don't hesitate to point this out.
The ring $\Bbb{Z}[\sqrt[3]{2}]$ is contained in the ring of integers $\mathcal{O}_K$ of $K:=\Bbb{Q}(\sqrt[3]{2})$. This is a cubic field with one real embedding and one pair of non-real embeddings into $\Bbb{C}$, so by Dirichlet's unit theorem $$\operatorname{rank}\mathcal{O}_K^{\times}=1.$$ This means that $\mathcal{O}_K^{\times}=\langle-1,\varepsilon\rangle$ for some fundamental unit $\varepsilon\in\mathcal{O}_K^{\times}$, and the units of $\Bbb{Z}[\sqrt[3]{2}]$ are a subgroup of $\mathcal{O}_K^{\times}$. If $\varepsilon$ is a fundamental unit then also $-\varepsilon$, $\varepsilon^{-1}$ and $-\varepsilon^{-1}$ are fundamental units, and there are no others. Clearly there is precisely one fundamental unit $\eta$ such that $\rho(\eta)>1$, where $\rho$ is the unique real embedding of $K$.
In this particular case $\Delta_K=-108$, from which it follows that $$\rho(\eta)\geq\sqrt[3]{21}.$$ Because $1<\rho(1-\sqrt[3]{2})<0$ we know that $1-\sqrt[3]{2}=-\eta^{-k}$ for some $k>0$, and hence that $$\sqrt[3]{2}-1=\eta^{-k}\leq\sqrt[3]{21}^{-k},$$ which implies $k=1$; if we suppose $k\geq2$ then we get $\sqrt[3]{2}-1\leq\sqrt[3]{21}^{-2}<2^{-2}$ which implies that $$\sqrt[3]{2}<1+2^{-2}=\tfrac{5}{4}\qquad\text{ and so }\qquad2<\tfrac{125}{64},$$ a contradiction. Therefore $k=1$ and $1-\sqrt[3]{2}=-\eta^{-1}$ is a fundamental unit.
This shows that $\mathcal{O}_K^{\times}=\langle-1,1-\sqrt[3]{2}\rangle$, and because both generators are in $\Bbb{Z}[\sqrt[3]{2}]$ it follows that $$\Bbb{Z}[\sqrt[3]{2}]^{\times}=\langle-1,1-\sqrt[3]{2}\rangle.$$ So you don't get all units in $\Bbb{Z}[\sqrt[3]{2}]$ by letting $n$ run over the integers for $(1-\sqrt[3]{2})^n$, but you do get them all by letting $n$ run over the integers for $(1-\sqrt[3]{2})^n$ and for $-(1-\sqrt[3]{2})^n$. This doesn't give you any non-units, because the product of two units is always a unit; the units form a group!