Here $E$ is the exact sequence $M^{\prime} \stackrel{f}{\rightarrow} M \stackrel{g}{\rightarrow} M^{\prime \prime} \rightarrow 0$. I know what an exact sequence of $A$-modules is, but not what $\text{Hom}(E,\text{Hom}(N,P))$ means and what it means for it to be exact.
2026-04-01 09:54:40.1775037280
What does it mean for the sequence $\text{Hom}(E,\text{Hom}(N,P))$ to be exact, where $E$ is an exact sequences of $A$-modules, and $N,P$ $A$-modules?
21 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in NOTATION
- Symbol for assignment of a truth-value?
- Does approximation usually exclude equality?
- Is division inherently the last operation when using fraction notation or is the order of operation always PEMDAS?
- Question about notation $S^c$
- strange partial integration
- What does Kx mean in this equation? [in Carnap or Russell and Whitehead's logical notation]
- Need help with notation. Is this lower dot an operation?
- What does this "\" mathematics symbol mean?
- Why a set or vector start counting from a negative or zero index?
- How to express a sentence having two for all?
Related Questions in MODULES
- Idea to make tensor product of two module a module structure
- $(2,1+\sqrt{-5}) \not \cong \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ as $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$-module
- Example of simple modules
- $R$ a domain subset of a field $K$. $I\trianglelefteq R$, show $I$ is a projective $R$-module
- $S_3$ action on the splitting field of $\mathbb{Q}[x]/(x^3 - x - 1)$
- idempotent in quiver theory
- Isomorphism of irreducible R-modules
- projective module which is a submodule of a finitely generated free module
- Exercise 15.10 in Cox's Book (first part)
- direct sum of injective hull of two modules is equal to the injective hull of direct sum of those modules
Related Questions in EXACT-SEQUENCE
- Does every sequence of digits occur in one of the primes
- Linear transformation and Exact sequences
- Snake lemma and regular epi mono factorization
- Replacing terms of an exact sequence by quotients
- Module over integral domain, "Rank-nullity theorem", Exact Sequence
- Inclusion and quotient mappings in exact sequences
- Parsing the Bockstein morphism
- Short exact sequence on modules
- G-groups homomorphism regarding the subgroup fixed by G
- A problem about split exact sequences.
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
For any two $A$-modules $M, N$, the set $\operatorname{Hom}(M, N)$ of $A$-homomorphisms is an $A$-module again (via $(\phi + \psi)(m) = \phi(m) + \psi(m)$ and $(a\phi)(m) = a \phi(m)$ as usual).
Also, if you have an $A$-homomorphism $f : M' \to M$, you get an $A$-homomorphism $f^* : \operatorname{Hom}(M, N) \to \operatorname{Hom}(M', N)$ via $f^*(\phi) = \phi \circ f$. (Check!) This is also written $\operatorname{Hom}(f, N)$ occasionally. (Also note that the order in which $M$ and $M'$ appear is different for $f$ and $f^*$, one says that $\operatorname{Hom}(\bullet, N)$ is a contravariant functor.)
Given your modules $N, P$ and your sequence $E$, we can first apply the above construction to get a new $A$-module $\operatorname{Hom}(N, P)$ and then apply the construction again to this and each module in the sequence $E$ to get modules $\operatorname{Hom}(M', \operatorname{Hom}(N, P))$ and so on. We can also apply it to the homomorphisms $f, g$ to get $$ 0 \to \operatorname{Hom}(M'', \operatorname{Hom}(N, P)) \xrightarrow{g^*} \operatorname{Hom}(M, \operatorname{Hom}(N, P)) \xrightarrow{f^*} \operatorname{Hom}(M', \operatorname{Hom}(N, P)) $$ which is again a sequence of $A$-modules. This is what is meant by $\operatorname{Hom}(E, \operatorname{Hom}(N, P))$.
As it is a sequence of $A$-modules, the usual definition of “exactness” applies. (You will not need that the second argument is $\operatorname{Hom}(N, P)$; this form of exactness will hold with any $A$-module in the second position.)