I have a function $f:\Omega\to \mathbb{R}^n$ with compact support in a domain $\Omega \subseteq \mathbb{R}^2$.. I don't know what it means to extend $f$ by zero outside $\Omega$, I've never heard of that before. If somebody could tell me what this means then that would be much appreciated.
2026-04-12 04:44:48.1775969088
What does it mean to extend a function by zero outside of its domain?
920 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in NOTATION
- Symbol for assignment of a truth-value?
- Does approximation usually exclude equality?
- Is division inherently the last operation when using fraction notation or is the order of operation always PEMDAS?
- Question about notation $S^c$
- strange partial integration
- What does Kx mean in this equation? [in Carnap or Russell and Whitehead's logical notation]
- Need help with notation. Is this lower dot an operation?
- What does this "\" mathematics symbol mean?
- Why a set or vector start counting from a negative or zero index?
- How to express a sentence having two for all?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
After having spent some time searching, I cannot find an obvious dupe target for this question. I am, frankly, quite surprised by this. However, it is not an unreasonable question, and I think it deserves to be answered on MSE. I am going to answer a slightly more general question:
Suppose that $\Omega \subsetneq X$ and that a function $$ f : \Omega \to Y $$ is given. That is, suppose that we are given a function which is defined only on a subset of a smaller set. Given such a function, it is reasonable to ask if there is a natural way of defining $f$ so that it "makes sense" on all of $X$, instead of just a subset. If there is a way of doing this, the result is called an "extension" of $f$. Somewhat more formally:
In other words, $\tilde{f}$ (the extension of $f$) is a new function defined on a larger set than $f$, but which agrees with $f$ on the set where where both functions are defined. Another way of saying this is that the restricttion of $\tilde{f}$ to $\Omega$ is $f$: $$ \tilde{f}|_{\Omega} = f. $$ We can then "extend a function by [blank]", where [blank] describes some property which we want $\tilde{f}$ to have. So, to give a couple of examples:
To extend $f$ by zero, we define $\tilde{f}$ to be zero away from $\Omega$. That is, we define $$ \tilde{f} : X \to Y : x \mapsto \begin{cases} f(x) & \text{if $x\in \Omega$, and} \\ 0 & \text{otherwise}. \end{cases} $$ In other words, when we extend a function by zero, we simply define the extension to be zero away from the set of interest.
To extend $f$ by continuity, we define $\tilde{f}$ so that it is continuous on $X$. For this to work, we must assume that $X$ and $Y$ are topological spaces, and, as it wouldn't really make sense to extend a discontinuous function by continuity, we typically also assume that $f$ is continuous on $\Omega$. An elementary example of this might be exponential function: for a fixed (positive) constant it is not too difficult to define $$ \exp_c : \mathbb{Q} \to \mathbb{R} : \frac{p}{q} \mapsto \sqrt[q]{c^p}, $$ where $$ x^p := \prod_{j=1}^{p} x \qquad\text{and}\qquad \left(\sqrt[q]{x}\right)^q = x. $$ This function can be extended by continuity to a function on $\mathbb{R}$ in order to get the usual notion of an exponential function on $\mathbb{R}$.
To extend $f$ analytically, we define $\tilde{f}$ so that it is analytic on $X$. This notion comes up a lot in complex analysis: if $\Omega \subsetneq \mathbb{C}$ and $f : \Omega \to \mathbb{C}$ is an analytic function, then we might want to know if it is possible to extend $f$ to a function which is analytic on a larger domain. The Riemann zeta function is an example of such a beast: for real $s > 1$, we can define $$ \zeta(s) := \sum_{j=1}^{\infty} j^{-s}. $$ This function can then be extended to a function which is analytic on $\mathbb{C}\setminus\{1\}$. The properties of this extension are of tremendous interest in number theory. :)