This is a simple problem I cannot understand. The task is to solve:
$$\frac{2}{3} \times |5-2x| - \frac{1}{2} = 5$$
- As a first step, I isolate the absolute value, like this:
\begin{align} 2/3 \times |5-2x| &= 5 + 1/2\\ 2/3 \times |5-2x| &= 11/2\\ |5-2x| &= 11/2 ÷ 2/3 \\ |5-2x| &= 33/4\\ |5-2x| &= 8.25 \end{align} 2. Now, $|5-2x|$ can be two things: $$ |5-2x| =\begin{cases} 5-2x & x \geq 2.5\\ 5+2x & x < 2.5. \end{cases} $$
- Let's solve the equation $|5-2x| = 8.25$
if $x \geq 2.5$, then: \begin{align} 5-2x &= 8.25\\ -2x &= 3.25\\ x &= -1.625 \end{align} But we said that $x \geq 2.5$!
I get a similar contradiction if I calculte the other conditional: $x < 2.5$ \begin{align} -5+2x &= 8.25\\ 2x &= 13.25\\ x &= 6.625 \end{align} which is not smaller than $2.5$.
As far as I know, in such situations, we tend "reject the solution." But what does it mean for a solution not to confirm to a hypothesis?
(The problem is from Stitz & Zeager (2013) Precalculus, exercise: 2.2.1/8. I apologise for not being able to use nice formatting.)
$$5-2x\ge 0\iff |5-2x|=5-2x$$ but $$5-2x\ge0\iff 2x\le 5,$$
unlike what you wrote.
In this particular exercise, no hypothesis is rejected, so it doesn't illustrate the concept.