What exactly does it mean to say that an integral exists 'just in the distributional sense'? For example, the Fourier transform of $x^2 e^{-\lambda x}$ or of $H(R-|x|)$ where $R > 0$ and $H$ is the Heaviside-Function, are often said to exist only in that sense.
2026-04-08 19:39:44.1775677184
What does it mean to say an integral exists 'in the distributional sense'?
552 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ANALYSIS
- Analytical solution of a nonlinear ordinary differential equation
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Show that $d:\mathbb{C}\times\mathbb{C}\rightarrow[0,\infty[$ is a metric on $\mathbb{C}$.
- conformal mapping and rational function
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Proving whether function-series $f_n(x) = \frac{(-1)^nx}n$
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Proving smoothness for a sequence of functions.
- How to prove that $E_P(\frac{dQ}{dP}|\mathcal{G})$ is not equal to $0$
- Integral of ratio of polynomial
Related Questions in FOURIER-ANALYSIS
- An estimate in the introduction of the Hilbert transform in Grafakos's Classical Fourier Analysis
- Verifying that translation by $h$ in time is the same as modulating by $-h$ in frequency (Fourier Analysis)
- How is $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \cos(n\omega_0 t)dt=1$ and $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \sin(n\omega_0 t)=0$?
- Understanding Book Proof that $[-2 \pi i x f(x)]^{\wedge}(\xi) = {d \over d\xi} \widehat{f}(\xi)$
- Proving the sharper form of the Lebesgue Differentiation Theorem
- Exercise $10$ of Chapter $4$ in Fourier Analysis by Stein & Shakarchi
- Show that a periodic function $f(t)$ with period $T$ can be written as $ f(t) = f_T (t) \star \frac{1}{T} \text{comb}\bigg(\frac{t}{T}\bigg) $
- Taking the Discrete Inverse Fourier Transform of a Continuous Forward Transform
- Is $x(t) = \sin(3t) + \cos\left({2\over3}t\right) + \cos(\pi t)$ periodic?
- Translation of the work of Gauss where the fast Fourier transform algorithm first appeared
Related Questions in DISTRIBUTION-THEORY
- $\lim_{n\to\infty}n^2(\int_{-1/n}^0u(x-s)ds -\int_0^{1/n}u(x-s)ds)$ where $u(x)$ an infinitely differentiable function on R
- Approximating derivative of Dirac delta function using mollifiers
- Distributional solution of differential equation
- Solution of partiell differential equation using the fundamental solution
- Find a sequence converging in distribution but not weakly
- How to prove this Dirac delta limit representation is correct?
- Properties about Dirac Delta derivative
- Does $\mathrm{e}^x$ belong to $\mathcal{S}'(\mathbb{R}^n)$?
- Is there a sense in which this limit is zero?
- Schwartz kernel theorem and dual topologies
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
While the derivative in the distributional sense always exist, the same is not true for the Fourier transform or arbitrary (convolution) integrals. The Fourier transform in the distributional sense can be defined for tempered distributions. The space of tempered distributions $\mathcal{S}'$ is the dual space of the Schwartz space $\mathcal{S}$ (which is the function space of functions all of whose derivatives are rapidly decreasing). The Fourier transform is an automorphism on the Schwartz space, which enables to define the Fourier transform for its dual space by transposition, i.e. the Fourier transform of the tempered distribution $T\in \mathcal{S}'$ is defined via $$<\mathcal{F}(T),\phi>:=<T,\mathcal{F}(\phi)> \forall \phi\in\mathcal{S}$$
Regarding your question, $H(R-|x|)$ is a tempered distribution (or can be identified with a ...), but $x^2e^{-\lambda x}$ is not a tempered distribution. Perhaps you meant $x^2e^{-i\lambda x}$, which would be a tempered distribution. I propose this because your question might be motivated by the inverse Laplace transformation, where the $i$ is omitted.
Things get more tricky when it comes to multiplication (or convolution) of tempered distributions. These operations are not always defined. Even so it's easy to decide for two given tempered distributions whether their product (or convolution) is defined, writing down a set of sufficient conditions general enough to cover all cases which can occur in practice is nearly impossible.