Let $F$ be a field.
Let $K$ be a subset of $F$ which is closed under two binary operations $+,\cdot$
Assume $(K,+,\cdot)$ is a field.
Is $K$ called a subfield of $F$ in Bourbaki's definition?
Or, should $K$ contain the unity $1_F$? that is $(K,\cdot)$ a submonoid of $(F,\cdot)$?
See Nicolas Bourbaki, Algebra I : Chapters 1-3 (1998), Page 103 :
See page 114 :
Note
See the History section of Ring :
Faced with this terminological ambiguity, some authors [...] have tried to adopt more precise terms [e.g. Joseph Rotman, Galois Theory (2nd ed.)] :
rings with multiplicative identity: unital ring, unitary ring, ring with unity, ring with identity, or ring with $1$
rings not requiring multiplicative identity: rng or pseudo-ring.