I reach the following conclusion during a proof: $(\forall x)(\forall y)([y < x \Rightarrow H(y) < H(x)])$, the contrapositive of this statment is $(\forall x)(\forall y)([H(x) \leq H(y) \Rightarrow x \leq y])$ or should I modify something in the universal quantifiers too? and what about the quantifiers elimination, its possible to do this in a simple case like this one?
2026-03-25 11:16:07.1774437367
What is the correct way to apply contrapositive law in a proposition using universal quantifiers? Its possible to eliminate the quantifier?
102 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PROPOSITIONAL-CALCULUS
- Help with Propositional Logic Proof
- Can we use the principle of Explosion to justify the definition of implication being True when the antecedent is False?
- Simplify $(P \wedge Q \wedge R)\vee(\neg P\wedge Q\wedge\neg R)\vee(\neg P\wedge\neg Q\wedge R)\vee(\neg P \wedge\neg Q\wedge\neg R)$
- Alternative theories regarding the differences between the material conditional and the indicative conditionals used in natural language?
- Translations into logical notation
- Is the negation of $(a\wedge\neg b) \to c = a \wedge\neg b \wedge\neg c$?
- I am kind of lost in what do I do from here in Propositional Logic Identities. Please help
- Boolean Functional completeness of 5 operator set in propositional logic
- Variables, Quantifiers, and Logic
- Comparison Propositional Logic
Related Questions in QUANTIFIER-ELIMINATION
- How quantifier elimination works
- Proof concerning quantifier elimination and substructures
- Show that the theory of $ (\mathbb{Z}, s)$ has quantifier elimination.
- Complete theory with quantifier elimination has finite boolean algebra
- Quantificational formatting and going from using logic with words, to using it for math proofs
- How much arithmetic is required to formalize quantifier elimination in Presburger arithmetic?
- If $T$ admits quantifier elimination in $\mathcal{L}$, does it admit quantifier elimination in $\mathcal{L}(c)$?
- Why is quantifier elimination desirable for a given theory?
- Exercise 3.4.3 in David Marker's "Model Theory"
- Quantifier elimination exercise
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Your contraposition is correct.
If you form the contraposition of an implicative subformula, then the resulting formula will be logically equivalent after substituting the implication for the contraposition, and the rest of the formula remains unchanged, so you don't tinker with the quantifiers around the implication.
As for quantifier eliminiation: This formula has two universal quantifiers in front, which can be directly eliminated, yielding again just
$$H(x) \leq H(y) \Rightarrow x \leq y$$