All of the solutions that I have seen so far require solving an implicit equation after substituting in whatever $x$, $y$, and $z$ are. What are the explicit equations for each elliptical coordinate in a two dimensions and three dimensions
2026-04-08 17:27:04.1775669224
What is the explicit equation that converts Cartesian coordinates to elliptical coordinates?
1.9k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in COORDINATE-SYSTEMS
- How to change a rectangle's area based on it's 4 coordinates?
- How to find 2 points in line?
- Am I right or wrong in this absolute value?
- Properties of a eclipse on a rotated plane to see a perfect circle from the original plane view?
- inhomogeneous coordinates to homogeneous coordinates
- Find the distance of the point $(7,1)$ from the line $3x+4y=4$ measured parallel to the line $3x-5y+2=0.$
- A Problem Based on Ellipse
- Convert a vector in Lambert Conformal Conical Projection to Cartesian
- Archimedean spiral in cartesian coordinates
- How to find the area of the square $|ABCD|$?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
You haven't told us which convention you're using, but the one that I'm most used to is $$ \prod_{i=1}^n \frac{z-u_i}{z-\lambda_i} = 1 + \sum_{m=1}^n \frac{x_m^2}{z-\lambda_m} , $$ where $(x_1,\dots,x_n)$ are Cartesian coordinates and $(u_1,\dots,u_n)$ are ellipsoidal coordinates (with parameters $\lambda_1, \dots, \lambda_n$).
The way to read this is that the coordinates $u_i$ are the zeros of the $n$th degree polynomial in $z$ that you get in the numerator when putting the right-hand side on a common denominator.
For $n=2$, this means that $z=u_1$ and $z=u_2$ are the roots of the quadratic equation $$ (z-\lambda_1)(z-\lambda_2) + x_1^2 (z-\lambda_2) + x_2^2 (z-\lambda_1) = 0 , $$ (and you can of course write them explicitly with the usual formula $u_{1,2} = \ldots \pm \sqrt{\ldots}$), but for $n=3$ you would have to solve a cubic equation, so the expressions for $u_{1,2,3}$ are a complete mess; trying to write them down is not worth the trouble.
The expressions going the other way (expressing $x_m^2$ in terms of the $u_i$) are nice, though.