It appears as Proposition VI, in Gödel's 1931 paper "On Formally Undecidable Propositions in Principia Mathematica and Related Systems I" :
"To every $\omega$-consistent recursive class $\kappa$ of formulae there correspond recursive class-signs $r$, such that neither $v \, Gen \, r$ nor $Neg \, (v \, Gen \, r)$ belongs to $Flg (\kappa)$ (where $v$ is the free variable of $r$ )."
P.S. I know the meaning in plain English : "All consistent axiomatic formulations of number theory include undecidable propositions"
See :
$\kappa$ is a set of ("decidable") formulas and $Flg(\kappa)$ is the set of consequnces of $\kappa$, i.e. the set of formulas derivable from the formulas in $\kappa$ plus the (logical) axioms by rules of inference.
$\omega$-consistency is a stronger property than consistency (that, under suitable conditions, can be replaced by simple consistency) [see van Heijenoort, page 596].
$Neg(x)$ is the negation of the formula (whose Gödel number is) $x$ :
$xGeny$ is the generaliation of $y$ with respect to the variable $x$ :
In conclusion, under the $\omega$-consistency assumption, there is a (unary) predicate $P$ with Gödel number $r$ such that neither $\forall v P(r)$ nor $\lnot \forall v P(r)$ are derivable from the formulas in $\kappa$.
This means that the set $\kappa$ of formulae is incomplete.
See Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems.
See also this "modern" translation of Gödel's original paper.