I wanted to know how do we know that the rules that we follow when doing arithmetic with significant figures are correct? Like why when adding or subtracting we keep the same number of decimal places as the original number with the least decimal places and when multiplying and dividing we have to retain the same number of significant figures as in the number with the least of them. What is the proof of that? I searched on the web about it but couldn't find anything except the rules themselves. Thanks.
2026-04-15 06:23:28.1776234208
What is the proof of the rules of significant figures?
1.2k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in APPROXIMATION
- Does approximation usually exclude equality?
- Approximate spline equation with Wolfram Mathematica
- Solving Equation with Euler's Number
- Approximate derivative in midpoint rule error with notation of Big O
- An inequality involving $\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\sqrt{\sin x}\:dx $
- On the rate of convergence of the central limit theorem
- Is there any exponential function that can approximate $\frac{1}{x}$?
- Gamma distribution to normal approximation
- Product and Quotient Rule proof using linearisation
- Best approximation of a function out of a closed subset
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Intuitively it is not too difficult:
If you are trying to add $x$ and $y$ but are in fact adding $x+\delta$ and $y+\epsilon$ then the absolute error will be $\delta + \epsilon$, which will be dominated by the larger of the absolute errors, most likely by the absolute error in the number with the fewer decimal places. Subtraction is similar.
If you are trying to multiply $x$ and $y$ but are in fact multiplying $x\times(1+\delta)$ and $y\times(1+\epsilon)$ then the relative error will be $(1+\delta)(1 + \epsilon)-1 = \delta + \epsilon + \delta \epsilon $, which will be dominated by the larger of the relative errors, most likely by the by the relative error in the number with the fewer significant figures. Division is similar.
If you want to do this properly, use interval arithmetic.