I was reading this and notices multiple references to the fact that lines of symmetry and centera of mass are deeply interconnected, and I was wondering if anyone could give me a proof, or an intuitive explanation on why this relationship is true.
2026-02-24 00:52:17.1771894337
What is the proof the centers of mass lie along lines of symmetry and vise versa?
195 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in CALCULUS
- Equality of Mixed Partial Derivatives - Simple proof is Confusing
- How can I prove that $\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\frac{\ln(1+\cos(\alpha)\cos(x))}{\cos(x)}dx=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\pi^2}{4}-\alpha^2\right)$?
- Proving the differentiability of the following function of two variables
- If $f ◦f$ is differentiable, then $f ◦f ◦f$ is differentiable
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Number of roots of the e
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- How to prove $\frac 10 \notin \mathbb R $
- Proving that: $||x|^{s/2}-|y|^{s/2}|\le 2|x-y|^{s/2}$
Related Questions in SYMMETRY
- Do projective transforms preserve circle centres?
- Decomposing an arbitrary rank tensor into components with symmetries
- A closed manifold of negative Ricci curvature has no conformal vector fields
- Show, by means of an example, that the group of symmetries of a subset X of a Euclidean space is, in general, smaller than Sym(x).
- How many solutions are there if you draw 14 Crosses in a 6x6 Grid?
- Symmetry of the tetrahedron as a subgroup of the cube
- Number of unique integer coordinate points in an $n$- dimensional hyperbolic-edged tetrahedron
- The stretch factors of $A^T A$ are the eigenvalues of $A^T A$
- The square root of a positive semidefinite matrix
- Every conformal vector field on $\mathbb{R}^n$ is homothetic?
Related Questions in CENTROID
- Finding the centroid of a triangle in hyperspherical polar coordinates
- How to find the center of mass for a system of multiple solid spheres?
- Centroid in a Poincare disk model
- Center of mass versus center of surface
- Centroid formula ($\bar y$) integral - why difference of squares, rather than squared difference?
- Is the Centroid and Circumcenter of a triangle affine invariant?
- Complex Numbers: Triangle and Centroid
- Will moving towards the centroid of a triangle make us meet?
- In a circle $C(O(0,0),1)$ with a polygon inscribed $A_1A_2...A_n$
- Centroid of an Area Between Two Curves by Calculus
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Here's an intuition:
The idea of a line of symmetry is that you can flip the object over (keeping that line in the same place) and the flipped object will be identical to the one you started with. Any feature of the object that is not on the line of symmetry therefore matches an equal feature on the other side of the line. When you flip the object over, you swap the two features. You can't have the feature in just one place, because then when you flipped the object over, it would be different from the original object--the feature would have moved.
But as you can see from the formulas for center of mass, there is exactly one center of mass of an object. There will never be two or more centers of mass. So the center of mass must be on a line of symmetry; if it were anywhere else, the symmetry of the object would force it to have two centers of mass.
The paragraphs above approach the conclusion in a somewhat round-about way for the sake of rigor: there's a proof by contradiction hidden in there. More succinctly:
The mirror image of the object over its line of symmetry is identical to the original object, including the location of the center of mass. Therefore the center of mass must be at one of the points that does not move when it is mirror-imaged.