What is the significance of the "0<" in the definition of limits?

85 Views Asked by At

$∀ε>0,∃δ>0 $ s.t. $0< |x-a|<δ⇒|f(x)-L|<ε$

In the part where it says: "$0< |x-a|<δ$", what is the purpose of "$0<$"?

What if it was not there? How would that change the definition?

1

There are 1 best solutions below

0
On BEST ANSWER

If you allow $x$ to be equal to $a$ in the definition of a limit, it would imply every function defined at $a$ which has a limit would be continuous at $a$.

Thus, for instance, the function defined as $\smash{\begin{cases} f(x)=x&\text{if }\; x\ne 0,\\ f(0)=1,\end{cases}}\;$ would have no limit when $x$ tends to $0$, which is absurd.