In my experience $\wedge$ has something to do with the outer product, but I am not sure what it means when $t$ and $s$ are not vectors and the book I am reading does not explain it. I thought maybe it means $min\{s,t\}$ but before the book used it it had already specified that $s<t$, so we already know a priori what the minimum is.
2026-04-30 03:58:58.1777521538
What to $t\wedge s$ mean when $t$ and $s$ are just scalars?
168 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DEFINITION
- How are these definitions of continuous relations equivalent?
- If a set is open, does it mean that every point is an interior point?
- What does $a^b$ mean in the definition of a cartesian closed category?
- $\lim_{n\to \infty}\sum_{j=0}^{[n/2]} \frac{1}{n} f\left( \frac{j}{n}\right)$
- Definition of "Normal topological space"
- How to verify $(a,b) = (c,d) \implies a = c \wedge b = d$ naively
- Why wolfram alpha assumed $ x>0$ as a domain of definition for $x^x $?
- Showing $x = x' \implies f(x) = f(x')$
- Inferior limit when t decreases to 0
- Is Hilbert space a Normed Space or a Inner Product Space? Or it have to be both at the same time?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I was able to find a free (legal) preview of the book by searching for it on Amazon -- the preview includes page 25. I see why you are confused. I don't know if this is the right answer, but here is how I am understanding it.
They assumed $t > s$ when they defined the kernel $K_{H}(t,s)$. And then they defined another function afterward:
$R_{H}(t,s) = \displaystyle \int_{0}^{t \land s} K_{H}(t,u)K_{H}(s,u) \,du$.
I think that the formula they gave for $K_{H}(t,s)$ only holds if, when $t$ is fixed, the input $s$ is smaller than $t$. And you can see in the definition of $R_{H}(t,s)$ that it makes sense. In that definition, for fixed $t, s$, since we are integrating with respect to $u$ over $[0, t \land s]$, then each $u$ is already smaller than $t$, so the first factor in the product, $K_{H}(t,u)$ makes sense by the formula they gave. Also, each $u$ is smaller than $s$, so the second factor in the product, $K_{H}(s,u)$, make sense by the formula they gave.
So, if $t$ is fixed, then for each $s < t$, $K_{H}(t,s) = $ that formula they gave. Then for any $s, t$ (no matter which is bigger), $R_{H}(t,s)$ is the function that sends $(t,s)$ to the integral (w.r.t. $u$) over $[0, t\land s]$ of the product $K_{H}(t,u)K_{H}(s,u)$, and each of the factors in this product are defined by the $K_{H}$ formula since $u$ is always smaller than $t$ and $s$ (since it's smaller than $t \land s$ if $\land$ is the min symbol).