In some text books, I see that they teach Riemann sums first. In other texts, I see they teach anti-derivatives first.
Is there any pedagogical preference? It seems to me that we should teach Riemann sums first to understand the point of integrals.
Thoughts?
The historical order is the pedagogical order.
Areas and any other relevant ideas from geometry, treated informally
d(Area under graph of $f$) = $f(x)$ by the visual geometric argument.
Antiderivatives are therefore useful. Polynomials etc.
Riemann sum as discrete approximation, as formalization of "area" concept, as motivation for "dx", and as method to compute limits of some finite sums by taking integrals.