When we derive some formula and have to do huge algebraic expansions that deal with raising powers we use exponent rules mindlessly and we never write down the $\pm$ symbol. Why is this right?
My reasoning is that we write $\pm$ when were looking for a set of solutions (e.g., $x^2=4\implies x=\pm2$) but not when we know the exact identity of $x$. If we know the exact identity of a symbol we can use exponent rules. For example, $2=\sqrt{2^2}$ seems more valid than $2=\sqrt{4}$ (since in the former case we're clearly undoing an operation on the number 2, which could've been a symbol like $a$), if that makes sense at all. I know its a stupid thing to say, but well, I'd like to see what you think.
One problem with the $\pm$ notation is that we won't be able to do things like $a\sqrt{4}=\sqrt{a^24}$ where tricks like these are done all the time.
Actually, never. $\sqrt{b}$, by definition, is the nonnegative solution to the equation $x^2 = b$.
This means that, by definition, $\sqrt{a^2} = |a|$ for all real values of $a$.