Hello I had to test two hypothesis, one hypothesis gave a wald test statistic with value 0.00015 and the other a value of approximately 40. Is it true when I then say that we accept the hypothesis with the wald test statistic value of 0.0015 but reject the other?
2026-03-28 08:29:30.1774686570
When to we accept a hypothesis when using Wald test statistic?
2.2k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in STATISTICS
- Given is $2$ dimensional random variable $(X,Y)$ with table. Determine the correlation between $X$ and $Y$
- Statistics based on empirical distribution
- Given $U,V \sim R(0,1)$. Determine covariance between $X = UV$ and $V$
- Fisher information of sufficient statistic
- Solving Equation with Euler's Number
- derive the expectation of exponential function $e^{-\left\Vert \mathbf{x} - V\mathbf{x}+\mathbf{a}\right\Vert^2}$ or its upper bound
- Determine the marginal distributions of $(T_1, T_2)$
- KL divergence between two multivariate Bernoulli distribution
- Given random variables $(T_1,T_2)$. Show that $T_1$ and $T_2$ are independent and exponentially distributed if..
- Probability of tossing marbles,covariance
Related Questions in ESTIMATION
- Question on designing a state observer for discrete time system
- Some help with calculating the time remaining please???
- Is the usage of unbiased estimator appropriate?
- How to statistically estimate multiple linear coefficients?
- Is there an intuitive way to see that $\mathbb{E}[X|Y]$ is the least squares estimator of $X$ given $Y$?
- minimizing MSE of estimator $\theta(a,b) = \frac{1}{n} \sum^n_{i=1} Y_ia_i + b$
- a limit about exponential function
- I don't understand where does the $\frac{k-1}{k}$ factor come from, in the probability mass function derived by Bayesian approach.
- hints for calculation of double integral
- estimation of $\mu$ in a Gaussian with set confidence interval
Related Questions in HYPOTHESIS-TESTING
- Neyman-Pearson precision problem
- Rejecting null based on the likelihood ratio test
- What statistical test should I use?
- Should We Use a Paired or Two-Sample Test?
- How to prove inadmissibility of a decision rule?
- Statistics Hypothesis Testing of Continuous Variables
- Experimentally proving bias
- Hypothesis testing: mean comparison
- uniformly most powerful test: binomial distribution
- Can significance check be applied and which one?
Related Questions in TIME-SERIES
- Expected Value of a time series model
- Calculating the Mean and Autocovariance Function of a Piecewise Time Series
- Autocovariance of a Sinusodial Time Series
- Why do we use a sequence of random variables to model **Univariate** Time Series?
- Calculating the conditional probability of a location given a specific time frame
- Determining first element of an AR1 model
- Finding ACVF of An AR(3) Process
- Question on limiting form of Doob's submartingale inequality
- $x_t = A\sin(t) + B\cos(t)$ is deterministic
- Explaining the fit of Correlation and Covariance in AR and MA models
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
It is true, in the sense that a Wald statistics is expected to be small when the null hypothesis $H_0$ is true and big when is false. Thus, a value of the Wald statistic as small as 0.0015 is likely to lead to a not-rejection for any conventional significance level. Similarly, a value of the Wald statistics as big as 40 is likely lo lead to a rejection. However, to be definite, you should better declare the significance level $\alpha$ of your test. For example, if you are using a normally distributed statistics and $\alpha=0.1$ then the decision rule is:
Thus, since $z_{\alpha/2}=1.645$, you do not reject $H_0$ at the 0.1 level.
Finally, there is a problem in that it seems you did two tests on the same parameter. This is not correct or, at least, you should adjust the significance level for multiple testing.