I now understand how the green area is obtained from the set definition below in point 2, but how is that set itself constructed? More precisely, where do the points $(-1,3)$ and $(2,1)$ come from?
2026-03-30 13:20:01.1774876801
Where do the points (-1,3) and (2,1) come from?
49 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-PROGRAMMING
- Proving dual convex cone property
- Linear algebra: what is the purpose of passive transformation matrix?
- Building the model for a Linear Programming Problem
- Show that $ \ x_ 0 \ $ cannot be an optimal solution
- Is there any way to model this situation in integer programming?
- How to Solve a Linear Programming Problem in $n$ Dimension Space?
- How to solve a linear program without any given data?
- Constraints for continuous path within graph with at least one obligatory node in path
- Select the smallest strict positive value from a list of variables in a linear program.
- How to add nonnegative constraint to an LP problem
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?

If $(x_1,x_2)$ is a point in $R^2$ that's better than $(2,2)$ wrt both objectives, it must be the case that $$\begin{align} 3x_1+x_2 &> 3(2) + (2)\\ -x_1 + 2x_2&>-(2)+ 2(2) \end{align}\tag a $$ Rewrite system (a) into the form: $$\begin{align} 3(x_1-2)+(x_2-2) &> 0\\ -(x_1-2) + 2(x_2- 2)&>0 \end{align}\tag b $$ If we write $\beta$ for the LHS of the first inequality in (b) and $\alpha$ for the LHS of the second inequality, then we are requiring $\alpha>0$ and $\beta>0$. Solve the LHS of system (b) for $x_1$ and $x_2$ in terms of $\alpha$ and $\beta$ to obtain a characterization of all points $(x_1,x_2)$ better than $(2,2)$: $$ \begin{align} x_1-2=-\frac17\alpha +\frac27\beta\\ x_2-2=\frac37\alpha+\frac17\beta \end{align}\tag c $$ After relabeling $\lambda_1:=\frac\alpha7$ and $\lambda_2:=\frac\beta7$, the equations (c) are exactly the ones in point 2.