In the referenced text below, (1) is referring to Caratheodory's theorem for conical combinations.
For Caratheodory's theorem for convex combinations, I'm trying to understand what the purpose is of the up-projection. Now intuitively and from counterexamples I know that just n vectors doesn't suffice for convex combinations. However, it seems to me that if we just don't do the up-projection and go through the proof, we can still invoke (1) and go through the proof as normal...? (I'm sure I am mistaken, but not sure why.)
Any thoughts appreciated.
Thanks.


The reason is that if you take $X$ to be the vertices of a full-dimensional simplex in $\mathbb{R}^n$, then $|X|=n+1$ and the vector which is their average cannot be represented as a convex combination of less than $n+1$ vectors taken from $X$.