I'm currently reading "Rational surfaces with many nodes" by Dolgachev et al., avaliable here: http://www.math.lsa.umich.edu/~idolga/lisbon.pdf
A "surface" is always smooth and projective and let us work over $\mathbb{C}$ for simplicity.
Let $Z$ be a ruled surface with $h^1(Z, \mathcal{O}_Z) = q(Z) > 0$, and consider its Albanese map: $$ \alpha: Z \longrightarrow A. $$ Then (Beauville "complex algebraic surfaces" V.18) the image of $\alpha$ is a curve, let us write $C$, so that $$ \alpha: Z \longrightarrow C. $$ The curve $C$ is is smooth and of genus $q(Z)$ (Beauville V.15).
Now it is stated in the mentioned paper (proof of 3.2) that the generic fibre is isomorphic to $\mathbb{P}^1$. My question is, why? It seems like magic to me.
My thoughts so far: It seems very likely that it has to do with $Z$ being birational to the surface $D \times \mathbb{P}^1$, where $D$ is a smooth curve of genus $q(Z)$. I have tried to use generic smoothness in characteristic zero (Hartshorne 10.7) so that at least the fibres of $\alpha$ are smooth curves, but this did not bring me anywhere. Moreover, it should not be necessary, since this all should work over any algebraically closed field of characteristic $\neq 2$.
Hope: Is it in general true that if $Z$ is ruled and there is a surjective map $Z \rightarrow C$ to a smooth curve of genus $q(Z)$, the general fibre of this map is $\mathbb{P}^1$?
Lastly, any remarks on unnecessaryness of characteristic zero are highly appreciated!
Here's an answer that you might find useful. Let me stick to $\mathbb{C}$; maybe others can fill in the details for positive characteristic.
First of all, $\alpha$ has connected fibres in your case, and by Bertini its general fibre $G$ is smooth, so $G$ is an irreducible smooth curve.
On the other hand, since the curve $C$ has genus >0, there cannot be any nonconstant morphism $\mathbb{P}^1 \rightarrow C$, so for any smooth fibre $F$ (and hence any fibre) of the ruling of $Z$, we must have $\alpha(F) = \{pt\}$. In particular, if we take $F$ to be a general fibre of the ruling, it must be contained in a fibre of $\alpha$. Now if $G$ is not a fibre of the ruling, then $G$ intersects $F$. But then $F \subsetneq G$, contradicting the fact that $G$ is smooth and irreducible.