Is there a reason for the Laplace Transform starting at zero? Could the transform go from -1 to ∞ or 1 to ∞? I understand that the upper bound is for the sake of convergence; however, the lower bound seems fairly arbitrary. What does the Transform gain from starting at zero?
2026-04-02 12:12:16.1775131936
Why are the limits of integration set as they are for the Laplace Transform?
1.3k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in INTEGRATION
- How can I prove that $\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\frac{\ln(1+\cos(\alpha)\cos(x))}{\cos(x)}dx=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\pi^2}{4}-\alpha^2\right)$?
- How to integrate $\int_{0}^{t}{\frac{\cos u}{\cosh^2 u}du}$?
- Show that $x\longmapsto \int_{\mathbb R^n}\frac{f(y)}{|x-y|^{n-\alpha }}dy$ is integrable.
- How to find the unit tangent vector of a curve in R^3
- multiplying the integrands in an inequality of integrals with same limits
- Closed form of integration
- Proving smoothness for a sequence of functions.
- Random variables in integrals, how to analyze?
- derive the expectation of exponential function $e^{-\left\Vert \mathbf{x} - V\mathbf{x}+\mathbf{a}\right\Vert^2}$ or its upper bound
- Which type of Riemann Sum is the most accurate?
Related Questions in DEFINITE-INTEGRALS
- How can I prove that $\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\frac{\ln(1+\cos(\alpha)\cos(x))}{\cos(x)}dx=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\pi^2}{4}-\alpha^2\right)$?
- Closed form of integration
- Integral of ratio of polynomial
- An inequality involving $\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\sqrt{\sin x}\:dx $
- How is $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \cos(n\omega_0 t)dt=1$ and $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \sin(n\omega_0 t)=0$?
- Roots of the quadratic eqn
- Area between curves finding pressure
- Hint required : Why is the integral $\int_0^x \frac{\sin(t)}{1+t}\mathrm{d}t$ positive?
- A definite integral of a rational function: How can this be transformed from trivial to obvious by a change in viewpoint?
- Integrate exponential over shifted square root
Related Questions in IMPROPER-INTEGRALS
- multiplying the integrands in an inequality of integrals with same limits
- Closed form of integration
- prove that $\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{x^4}{1+x^8} dx= \frac{\pi}{\sqrt 2} \sin \frac{\pi}{8}$
- Generalized Fresnel Integration: $\int_{0}^ {\infty } \sin(x^n) dx $ and $\int_{0}^ {\infty } \cos(x^n) dx $
- Need a guide how to solve Trapezoidal rule with integrals
- For which values $p$ does $\int_0^\infty x\sin(x^p) dx $ converge?
- Proving $\int_0^1\frac{dx}{[ax+b(1-x)]^2}=\frac1{ab}$
- Contour integration with absolute value
- Use the comparison test to determine whether the integral is convergent or divergent.
- Can I simply integrate this function?
Related Questions in LAPLACE-TRANSFORM
- Solution to ODE with Dirac Delta satisfies ODE
- Calculating an inverse Laplace transform
- Laplace Transform working out
- How to solve the integral equation $f(x) = \int_0^x f(x-y)k(x,y)dy+g(x)$ for $f(x)$?
- Laplace Transform for an Initial Value Problem
- Laplace transform of a one-sided full-wave rectified...
- Laplace transform for the solution of a system of differential equations with no constant coefficients
- Question about Dirac comb
- Using Laplace transforms to solve a differential equation
- Prove $\int_0^{\infty} \frac{\cos xt}{1+t^2} dt = \frac{\pi}{2}e^{-x}$ by using Laplace Transform
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
For a physicist's or engineer's perspective, let's examine what is probably the most common application of Laplace transforms in the real world. Suppose that $x(t)$, the position of a particle at time $t$ is given by the differential equation, $$ m \frac{d^2 x}{dt^2} + \gamma \frac{dx}{dt} + k x = F(t),$$ where $F(t)$ is the force applied on the particle at time $t$. ($m$, $\gamma$ and $k$ represent the particle's mass, the friction and the strength of the restorative force respectively.)
Furthermore, we suppose that when $t < 0$, the force is zero and the system is stationary. The force is only "turned on" at time $t = 0$. Therefore, $x(t)$ and $F(t)$ are non-zero only for $t \geq 0$, we only really need to solve the differential equation for $t \geq 0$. (The initial conditions at $t = 0$ are $x(0) = 0$ and $\frac{dx}{dt}(0) = 0$.)
We can solve this equation using Laplace transforms. Taking Laplace transforms of both sides, the differential equation turns into an algebraic equation which is easier to solve. Once we have solved this algebraic equation, we invert the Laplace transform, giving the final answer, $$ x(t) = \mathcal L^{-1} \left[ \frac{\mathcal L[F](s)}{ms^2 + \gamma s + k}\right].$$
But the thing I want to draw your attention to is the fact that, in the context of this physics problem, the $x(t)$ and the $F(t)$ are only non-zero when $t \geq 0$. So when you define their Laplace transforms, it is only natural to integrate over $t \geq 0$: $$ \mathcal L[x](s) := \int_0^\infty e^{-ts} x(t) dt, \ \ \mathcal L[F](s) := \int_0^\infty e^{-ts} F(t) dt.$$ Integrating over the whole of $\mathbb R$ is pointless, seeing that $x(t)$ and $F(t)$ are zero when $t < 0$ anyway! So in the context of this physics problem, it is natural to define the Laplace transforms using integrals over $[0, \infty)$.