Why Can't We Use The MLA Lemma?

63 Views Asked by At

Consider the following diagram with stated conditions, enter image description here

Using the ML lemma, it is possible to show that $$\int_{\Gamma_1} f(z) \ dz\rightarrow 0\ \ \text{as} \ \ R\rightarrow\infty, \ \ \text{as} \ \ \left|\int_{\Gamma_1} f(z) \ dz\right|\leq\frac{2\pi}{R}.$$

My question is, why can we not use a similar computation to find $$\lim_{r\to 0}\int_{\Gamma_3} f(z) \ dz?$$

1

There are 1 best solutions below

7
On BEST ANSWER

For $\Gamma_3$, we can write \begin{align*} \lim_{r\to0}\int_{\Gamma_3}f(z)\,\mathrm{d}z&=\lim_{r\to0}\int_\pi^0 \frac{1-e^{ire^{i\theta}}}{r^2e^{2i\theta}}\,rie^{i\theta}\,\mathrm{d}\theta\\ &= \lim_{r\to0}\;i\int_0^\pi\frac{e^{ire^{i\theta}}-1}{re^{i\theta}}\,\mathrm{d}\theta\\ &= \lim_{r\to0}\;i\int_0^\pi \frac{\left(1+ire^{i\theta}-\frac{1}{2}r^2e^{2i\theta}+\cdots\right)-1}{re^{i\theta}}\,\mathrm{d}\theta\\ &= \lim_{r\to0}\,i\int_0^\pi\left(i-\frac{1}{2}re^{i\theta}-\frac{i}{6}r^2e^{2i\theta}+\cdots\right)\,\mathrm{d}\theta\\ &= \,-1\int_0^\pi1\,\mathrm{d}\theta\\ &=-\pi \end{align*}