I was reading the Basel sum proof and found the following passage:
$\frac{1}{n^2}= \iint_R \,(xy)^{n-1} \,dx\,dy \quad ;\quad R=[1,0]\times [1,0] \Longrightarrow $
$ \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^2} = \iint_R \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (xy)^{n-1} \,dx\,dy = \iint_R \ \frac{1}{1-xy} \,dx\,dy$
I don't know why it's correct to pass the limit inside the integral. I read here on the forum that this is only possible when the integrand converges uniformly across the entire domain, which doesn't seem to be the case.
The sequence of functions $f_n = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} x^{n-1}$ does not converge uniformly in $(0,1)$. but on any interval $(0,a) ; 0\leq a \leq 1 $
does the sequence $f_n(x,y)= \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} {(xy)}^{n-1}$ converge uniformly to $f(x,y)=\frac{1}{1-xy}$ in $[1,0] \times [1,0]$ ?
How to justify such a passage?
$|x^n-c^n|=|x-c|\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}x^kc^{n-1-k}<n|x-c|c^{n-1}$
$|x-c|<\frac{\epsilon}{n}$. Epsilon is independent of $c$ so we do have uniform continuity.
Generally, a bounded derivative on an interval implies uniform continuity on that interval.