Why did my teacher integrate \varphi in the opposite direction while solving a triple integral for volume in spherical coordinates?

70 Views Asked by At

In Calculus III class today we learned how to evaluate triple integrals in spherical coordinates. One of the example questions we worked on was to use a triple integral to find the volume of a shape.

Use spherical coordinates to find the volume of the region $Q$ bounded by the cylinders $r = 1$ and $r = 2$, and the cones $\varphi = \frac{\pi}{3}$ and $\varphi = \frac{\pi}{6}$.

The image provided by the book is.

Image of the problem described

While working ahead I found $dV = \rho^2 \sin\varphi d\rho d\varphi d\theta$, $\rho_1 = \csc\varphi$, and $\rho_2 = 2\csc\varphi$ and used this information to evaluate the integral:

$$\iiint_QdV = \int_0^{2\pi} \int_{\frac{\pi}{6}}^{\frac{\pi}{3}} \int_{\csc\varphi}^{2\csc\varphi} \rho^2 \sin\varphi d\rho d\varphi d\theta = \frac{28\pi}{3\sqrt3}$$

The teacher finally caught up and agreed on everything I wrote, but she wrote the middle integral as $\int_{\frac{\pi}{3}}^{\frac{\pi}{6}}$. This makes no sense to me because $\frac{\pi}{6} < \frac{\pi}{3}$ and when increasing the value of $\varphi$ $\frac{\pi}{6}$ is encountered first followed later by $\frac{\pi}{3}$.

Her argument for doing it this way is that $\frac{\pi}{3}$ is encountered first when traveling from the xy-plane in the positive z direction, which was what we considered when finding the limits of integration in rectangular coordinates. Doing it her way the answer is $-\frac{28\pi}{3\sqrt3}$ which is negative, and therefore doesn't represent volume. I don't think that her way is correct. Especially since it directly contradicts the questions we worked over before this one.

Which way is the right way? I want to be sure I understand this correctly.