Why do projective structures correspond to quadratic forms?

147 Views Asked by At

So I'm trying to read Feng Luo's paper "Monodromy Groups of Projective Structures on Punctured Surfaces", but I'm stumped on the first page. A projective structure on a Riemann surface is defined to be an (equivalence class of) atlas of holomorphic coordinate charts whose composition maps are restrictions of projective transformations - in other words, $S = \bigcup_a U_a$ with $\phi_a: U_a \rightarrow V_a \subset \mathbb{C},$ with $\phi_b \circ \phi_a^{-1}$ a Mobius map.

On the other hand, a holomorphic quadratic differential is something that can locally be written as $f(z) dz^2$, such that $f$ is holomorphic if $z$ is a holomorphic coordinate - so, with a holomorphic atlas $U_a$, $\phi_a = z_a$, we have a collection of functions $f_a : V_a \rightarrow \mathbb{C}$ such that $$\frac{f_a}{f_b} = \left( \frac{dz_b}{dz_a} \right)^2 $$ for all $a,b$.

The statement is then that the set of all projective structures on a Riemann surface is an affine space over the vector space of all holomorphic quadratic differentials. So, given a projective structure $\lbrace \phi_a \rbrace_a,$ there is a way to "add" any holomorphic quadratic differential $\lbrace f_a \rbrace_a$ to it, to obtain a new projective structure, such that any two projective structures differ by a holomorphic quadratic differential in this way.

Can anyone help me to see how this works?