Why do the interesting antihomomorphisms tend to be involutions?

236 Views Asked by At

Given a semigroup $S$, define that an antihomomorphism on $S$ is a function $$* :S \rightarrow S$$

satisfying $(xy)^* = y^*x^*.$ Examples abound. Consider:

  1. Transposition, where $S$ equals the set of $2 \times 2$ real matrices.
  2. Conjugate-transposition, where $S$ equals the set of $2 \times 2$ complex matrices.

  3. The map that takes a binary relation to its converse, where $S$ equals the monoid of binary relations on a set $X$.

  4. Inversion, in any group.

The weird thing is that in all of the above examples, the star operation is actually involutive. In fact, off the top of my head I can't think of any non-trivial antihomomorphisms that aren't also involutions.

Why do the antihomomorphisms of interest tend to be involutions?

I mean, is there some sort of "killer theorem" or something, that just makes involutive antihomomorphisms totally awesome?

Conversely, I am also interested in examples of antihomomorphisms that fail to be involutions, but which are still deemed important.

1

There are 1 best solutions below

0
On

Contravariant functors are antihomomorphisms of small categories considered as semigroups.