Why do we have $\psi^{(m)} (z)=(-1)^{m+1}\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{t^me^{-zt}}{1-e^{-t}}dt$?

112 Views Asked by At

Why is the following representation true? $$\psi^{(m)} (z)=(-1)^{m+1}\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{t^me^{-zt}}{1-e^{-t}}dt,$$

where $\psi^{(m)} (z)$ denotes the Polygamma function.

2

There are 2 best solutions below

9
On BEST ANSWER

The question really is: why do we have $$\psi^{(1)}(z)=\int_0^{\infty}\frac{te^{-zt}dt}{1-e^{-t}},\tag{1}$$ since the statement for $m>1$ is obtained by straightforward differentiation with respect to $z$. (Also note that we cannot set $m=0$ since the integral will become divergent.)

The formula (1) is an easy consequence of the infinite product representation for the gamma function (see formula (16) here): $$\Gamma(z)=\left[ze^{\gamma z}\prod_{k=1}^{\infty}\left(1+\frac{z}{k}\right)e^{-z/k}\right]^{-1}.$$ Taking the logarithm at both sides of this relation and differentiating twice w.r.t. $z$, we find $$\psi^{(1)}(z)=\frac{d^2}{dz^2}\ln\Gamma(z)=\frac{1}{z^2}+\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{(z+k)^2}=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{(z+k)^2}.\tag{2}$$ To show that (1) and (2) are equivalent, it suffices to expand $\displaystyle \frac{1}{1-e^{-t}}$ in (1) into geometric series and observe that $$\int_{0}^{\infty}te^{-(z+k)t}dt=\frac{1}{(z+k)^2}.$$

3
On

Start by the following

$$\int^{\infty}_0 \frac{e^{-t}}{t}-\frac{e^{-(x+1)t}}{1-e^{-t}}\, dt$$

Making the substitution $e^{-t}=y$

$$\int^{1}_0 \frac{1}{-\log(y)}-\frac{y^{t}}{1-y}\, dy$$

By a little trick we have

$$\int^{1}_0 \frac{1}{-\log(y)}-\frac{1}{1-y}\, dy +\int^1_0 \frac{1-y^{t}}{1-y}\, dy$$

The left hand is another form of the Euler-Mascheroni constant.

$$-\gamma +\int^1_0 \frac{1-y^{t}}{1-y}\, dy=\psi(t+1)$$

Hence we have

$$\psi(x+1)=\int^{\infty}_0 \frac{e^{-t}}{t}-\frac{e^{-(x+1)t}}{1-e^{-t}}\, dt$$

or

$$\psi(x)=\int^{\infty}_0 \frac{e^{-t}}{t}-\frac{e^{-xt}}{1-e^{-t}}\, dt$$

The first derivative shows

$$\psi'(x)=\int^{\infty}_0 \frac{te^{-xt}}{1-e^{-t}}\, dt$$

And the result follows by continuous differentiation with respect to $x$.

Look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler%E2%80%93Mascheroni_constant#Integrals