In the theory of automorphic forms, functions we consider are not totally invariant (why? is it because otherwise there would be too few of them, like none except constants?), but "twisted" by a certain "automorphic factor": $$f(\gamma z) = j(\gamma,z)^kf(z)$$ or a fixed $k$ and $j(\gamma,z) = (cz+d)/|cz+d|$ (or is it sometimes just $cz+d$?). I do not get at all reasons for this factor to be this one, rather than... anything else. Are there theories of automorphic forms for more generic $j(\gamma,z)$? or has this one very specific reasons to be of this form?
2026-03-27 12:34:30.1774614870
Why does the "automorphic factor" exist?
147 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in AUTOMORPHIC-FORMS
- orbit representatives for the group of unipotent matrix acting on the set of skew-symmetric matrices
- Evaluating $\displaystyle\int_{-\infty+iy}^{\infty+iy}(cv)^{-k}e\left(\frac{-m}{c^2v}-nv\right)dv$.
- Fuchsian Groups of the First Kind and Lattices
- Sub representation generated by a Laplace eigenfunction
- Non-vanishing of K-Bessel function
- Is there any known explicit value of dimension of space of Maass forms?
- Meromorphic functions on $X(1)$ are rational functions of $j$
- Are automorphic forms eigenfunctions?
- on Selberg trace formula
- Points of Scholze's Anticanonical Tower
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
There are several slightly different traditions in story-line and in the objects that first arise, for one thing. One well-known version is that "elliptic modular forms" are holomorphic functions on the complex upper half-plane meeting a cocycle condition $f(\gamma(z))=(cz+d)^{2k}\cdot f(z)$, for $\gamma$ in $SL_2(\mathbb Z)$ (etc.) with lower row $(c\,d)$, where $2k$ is the "weight". So these functions are not invariant... but the symmetric differential forms (sections of line bundles!) $f(z)\cdot dz^k$ are invariant. (So, yes, the $cz+d$ powers are special, in this sense...)
The other primary story is about Maass' waveforms, which are $SL_2(\mathbb Z)$-invariant, but merely required to be eigenfunctions for the invariant Laplacian on the upper half-plane.
These two ideas can be merged by converting functions $f$ on the upper half-plane to left $\Gamma=SL_2(\mathbb Z)$-invariant functions $F_f$ on the group $G=SL_2(\mathbb R)$ that acts transitively on it... For a waveform $f$ we can just let $F_f(g)=f(g(i))$. This creates a left $\Gamma$-invariant function on $G$ that is also right $K=SO(2,\mathbb R)$-invariant, and an eigenfunction for Casimir.
For a modular form $f$ of weight $2k$, let $F_f(g) = (cz+d)^{2k}f(g(i))$. A little computation (if I got the sign in the exponent right) verifies that this has become left $\Gamma$-invariant (no cocycle stuff any more), and is right $K$-equivariant by a character corresponding to the weight. EDIT: and is again an eigenfunction for Casimir, with eigenvalue determined by the weight $2k$.
There are other possible cocycles in general, for example for half-integral weight forms... which do not extend from the discrete subgroup to the ambient Lie group... requiring an extension (e.g., metaplectic group...).