I was looking into determining the number of solutions to the $n$-Queens problem, admittedly to study DFS for a course.
During this study, I naturally found OEIS A000170, which lists the number of solutions. The solution count for $n = 6$ stood out, as it seems to be the only value of $n$ for which the value drops from its previous iteration.
Why does this specific board size seems to be so specific in its queen layout? Is there a nice mathematical explanation for this or is it just a neat coincidence?
When $n=7,$ I think the latin squares provide $28$ of the examples, and there are $12$ others.
This is a Soft Question.
Here is my thinking about it.
OBSERVATION 1 : When $a(n+1)$ can use some of the Solutions of $a(n)$ & then have additional Solutions , then we can have Increase in $a(n+1)$ compared to $a(n)$.
OBSERVATION 2 : Specifically , when the Diagonal is free , we can add the next row (+ column) & place the queen in the Diagonal. We have 4 Corners to include here.
That works in large $n$ Cases , hence $a(n)$ is generally Increasing.
Here is a Section given by https://oeis.org/A000170 :

Here , we can check that $n=4$ has the free Diagonal , hence that gives $n=5$ Solutions with the queen on the new row on the Diagonal. We have a new Independent Solution with the Diagonal in the middle , hence $n=5$ is still Increasing compared to $n=4$.
We have $a(4)=2$ which each of which gives $4$ Solutions (4 Diagonals) hence $2 \times 4 =8$ , then 2 new Independent Solutions with the Queen on the Diagonal in the middle. Hence $a(5)$ total is $8+2=10$ , where all use the Diagonal.
With all Solutions using the Diagonal , $n=6$ can not re-use the $n=5$ Solutions , hence we have a breakage here.
All Solutions of $n=6$ are new & Independent , not able to re-use the $n=5$ Solutions.
The new Solutions are not enough to Increase the Count. Hence the $a=6$ Case will have Decrease compared to $a(5)$.