Why is the functor from the lattice of open subsets of the reals to Set contravariant?

64 Views Asked by At

…our sheaf of continuous functions on the reals consists in specifying, for each open subset $U ⊆ R$, the set $C(U,R)$ of real continuous functions on $U$. Clearly, when $V ⊆ U$ is a smaller open subset, every $f ∈ C(U,R)$ restricts as some $f|V ∈ C(V,R)$. Writing $O(R)$ for the lattice of open subsets of the reals, we get so a contravariant functor $C(−,R): O(R) \rightarrow Set$.

https://tcsc.lakecomoschool.org/files/2018/06/Como2018.pdf

Assuming $O(R)$ is a category where there is an arrow $f: A \rightarrow B$ if $A \subseteq B$, why does this imply a contravariant functor to $Set$?

In $Set$, the arrows are functions between sets.

Does this functor map an arrow in $O(R)$ to a function $g: B \rightarrow A$?

Or the reverse, $f: A \rightarrow B$ if $B \subseteq A$, and $g: B \rightarrow A$ is the inclusion map of $B$ into $A$?

1

There are 1 best solutions below

0
On

If $U\subseteq V$ and $f:V\to\mathbb{R}$ then the construction turns it into $f_{|U}:U\to\mathbb{R}$. And therefore an arrow $U\to V$ is transformed into the arrow $$C(V,\mathbb{R})\to C(U,\mathbb{R})$$ $$f\mapsto f_{|U}$$ so contravariant.