I know that $\zeta = \sqrt[3]{5}$ satisfies the polynomial $x^3-5 \in \mathbb{Q}[x]$, and splits completely in $\mathbb{Q}(i, \alpha, \zeta)$, where $\alpha = \sqrt{3}$. I found the roots $x_1 = \zeta$, $x_2 = \zeta/2 + \zeta i \alpha /2$ and $x_3 = \zeta/2 - \zeta i \alpha /2$
And I can write $\zeta = x_1$, $\alpha = (2x_1/x_2 - 1)^4/3$ and $i = (x_3-x_2)/(x_1\alpha)$, and since the polynomial $(x^3-5)$ already splits completely over $\mathbb{Q}(i, \alpha, \zeta)$, why do I need the extra term $(x^2+1)$?
The splitting field of $x^3-5$ over $\mathbb{Q}$ is $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[3]{5}, i\sqrt{3})$. In particular, $i,\sqrt{3} \not\in \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[3]{5}, i\sqrt{3}),$ which becomes apparent if you realize $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[3]{5}, i\sqrt{3})$ as a $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[3]{5})$-vector space with basis $\{1, i\sqrt{3}\}$ (along with the provable fact $\sqrt{3} \not\in \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[3]{5})$)