Why is the Zariski topology coarser than standard topology

641 Views Asked by At

I'm trying to learn about the Zariski topology (without prior knowledge of algebraic sets). I'm asked to prove that if $\tau_1$ is the Zariski topology on $\Bbb{C}^2$ and $\tau_2$ is the standard topology on $\Bbb{C}^2$ then $\tau_1$ is coarser than $\tau_2$. So proving $\tau_1\subseteq\tau_2$ wasn't hard - we can think of every open set in $\tau_1$ basis as $U_f=\{x\in\Bbb{C}^2:f(x)\neq 0\}=\Bbb{C}^2\setminus f^{-1}(\{0\})$ which is obviously open in $\tau_2$ since $f$ is continuous. The problem starts when trying to show $\tau_1\subsetneq\tau_2$. What open set in $\tau_2$ is not open in $\tau_2$?

2

There are 2 best solutions below

0
On BEST ANSWER

It's a good first step to understand the version with $\mathbb{C}$ in place of $\mathbb{C}^2$. Here we're looking at single-variable polynomials over $\mathbb{C}$, and these are relatively simple. In particular, we have a good understanding of $\{u: f(u)=0\}$ for such an $f$:

It's either finite or all of $\mathbb{C}$.

This means that any closed in the usual sense subset of $\mathbb{C}$ not satisfying this same "size condition" cannot be Zariski closed. For example:

The unit disc $\{x+yi: x^2+y^2\le 1\}$ is closed in the usual sense and infinite but not all of $\mathbb{C}$.


OK, now how can we lift this to $\mathbb{C}^2$?

Well, there are various ways to do this, but one I quite like is to consider sections. Suppose $f(u,v)$ is a polynomial over $\mathbb{C}$ in two variables. Fix some $z\in\mathbb{C}$; we then get a single-variable polynomial $$g(u)=f(u,z).$$

  • What can we say about $\{u: g(u)=0\}$ (thinking about the previous section of this answer?

  • How does that give an example of a subset $A\subseteq\mathbb{C}^2$ which is closed in the usual topology but not in the Zariski topology?

HINT: think about $[0,1]$ ...

2
On

Here's a quick proof:

Every Zariski closed subset is quasi-compact (in the Zariski topology). If $\tau_1$ were equal to $\tau_2$, then the same would be true of standard closed sets (in the standard topology), but of course this is not the case, e.g. $\mathbb{C}^2$ itself is closed and not quasi-compact in the standard topology.