Why it looks like divisor is more important than multiple?

44 Views Asked by At

So far as I've been reading any number theory and algebra books,

They seem to take more care of "divisor" than of "multiple".

But I haven't seen any kind of number theory beginning with "multiple".

I guess one of the reasons is that multiples are easy to be calculated, you just multiply. (Of course, it takes a little bit of time.)

But divisors are not easy, if you give me tremendously big number, say $10^{100}$-digit number and ask me to find its divisors, I couldn't do that even if I'm allowed to use my calculator.

I guess there is a huge gap between their complexity of computations.

I'd like to know whether there is any reason why they start with divisors.