I am looking to prove the following however I am struggling. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.
We let $G$ be an open set so that $\mathbb{Q} \subseteq G$ and $|G| < 1$, and let $f : \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be given by $f = \chi_G$. I am wanting to show that there is no Borel set $B$
with $|\mathbb{R} \backslash B| = 0$ so that $f|B$ is continuous.
2026-03-27 00:03:43.1774569823
Why Luzin's theorem can not be changed from $|\mathbb{R} \backslash B| < \epsilon$ to $|\mathbb{R} \backslash B| = 0$
75 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Is this relating to continuous functions conjecture correct?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
Related Questions in MEASURE-THEORY
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- I can't undestand why $ \{x \in X : f(x) > g(x) \} = \bigcup_{r \in \mathbb{Q}}{\{x\in X : f(x) > r\}\cap\{x\in X:g(x) < r\}} $
- Trace $\sigma$-algebra of a product $\sigma$-algebra is product $\sigma$-algebra of the trace $\sigma$-algebras
- Meaning of a double integral
- Random variables coincide
- Convergence in measure preserves measurability
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- $f\in L_{p_1}\cap L_{p_2}$ implies $f\in L_{p}$ for all $p\in (p_1,p_2)$
Related Questions in LEBESGUE-INTEGRAL
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- Square Integrable Functions are Measurable?
- Lebesgue measure and limit of the integral.
- Solving an integral by using the Dominated Convergence Theorem.
- Convergence of a seqence under the integral sign
- If $g \in L^1$ and $f_n \to f$ a.e. where $|f_n| \leq 1$, then $g*f_n \to g*f$ uniformly on each compact set.
- Integral with Dirac measure.
- If $u \in \mathscr{L}^1(\lambda^n), v\in \mathscr{L}^\infty (\lambda^n)$, then $u \star v$ is bounded and continuous.
- Proof that $x \mapsto \int |u(x+y)-u(y)|^p \lambda^n(dy)$ is continuous
- a) Compute $T(1_{[\alpha,\beta]})$ for all $0<\alpha <\beta<0$
Related Questions in OUTER-MEASURE
- True or False Question on Outer measure.
- Which of the following is an outer measure?
- Which of the following is true about lebesgue measure
- set of points in $E_n$ infinitely often and almost always are in $\sigma$-algebra
- A countable set has outer measure zero. Explanation of Royden example.
- Finding all outer measures on a finite set
- Outer measure in a finite measure space.
- Can a compact connected set in $\mathbb{R}^n$ with empty interior have positive Lebesgue measure?
- n dimensional measure of homeomorphism of interval
- Let $\mu$ be a finite measure on $(X, M)$, and let $\mu^*$ be the outermeasure induced by $\mu$.
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
My attempt bellow. It was more delicate than I originally thought (do not look my edit, lol). Probably there is a simpler solution. I would appreciate any comments criticizing it as I might have made some mistake along the way, I'm a bit new to measure theory and the subtleties often escape me.
By abuse of notation, I denote the restriction of $f$ to $B$ as $f$, since I wont use the original function very much. I hope its clear.
The point is that as $B$ carries all of the mass of $\mathbb{R}$, there is no way to make $f$ "constant enough" on $B$ (and the only way for a characteristic function to be continuous is if its constant in each connected segment), because every subset of finite positive measure will intersect $B$ non trivially (otherwise $|\mathbb{R}\setminus B|>0$), and it cannot contain $B$ (because the measure of B is large). So, if $E=B\cap G$, $E$ is always not empty, $f(E) = \{1\}$, and there is always a $x \in B\setminus G$ such that $f(x) = 0$. (This proofs the result in case B is a connected borel subset of $\mathbb{R}$). Another observation is that $G=\cup I_n$ for disjoint open non empty intervals $I_n$, each containing a rational number..
I'll proof the following two cases:
First Case: $B$ is totally disconnected.
Now take any $x \in B\setminus G$ and a sequence $(r_k)$ of rationals converging to $x$. From this we can construct a sequence $(x_k)$ in $E= B\cap G$ (so $f(x_k)=1$ for every $k$) converging to $x$. Thus $f$ is not continuous at $x$, and as $x$ is arbitrary, it cannot be continuous on $B$. (i. e,$ \lim f(x_k) = 1 \neq 0= f(x) $ )
This construction is not hard, basically for every interval $J_\varepsilon$ centered in $x$ and lenght $\varepsilon$, there is a rational point $r_k \in G=\cup I_n$ (in fact infinitely many), so $J_\varepsilon \cap I_n$ is not empty for some $n$. This intersection is a interval of finite measure, so it has some point $x_1$ of $B$ sufficiently close to $x$, by the observations above. Repeating the argument for smaller and smaller $\varepsilon$, we get the desired sequence.
Second Case: $B$ has connected components.
If some connected component $A$ of $B$ contains some $I_n$ properly. In this case, we clearly have that $f$ is not continuous in this component, and we are done.
Suppose it doesn't happen. That is, every connected component of $B$ is contained or equal to some $I_n$. Them removing all of those from $B$, we are left with a totally disconnect set $B^\prime$ with most of the mass of $B$ because the mass of $G$ is small compared to $B$ (in other words, $B$ is "mostly disconnected"). But them, by the first case, $f$ cannot be continuous on $B^\prime$, so it also cannot be continuous on $B$. So we have no problems here.
I think that covers all the cases, but again, I might be missing something. I hope its helpful.