So far I have seen two approaches for a theory of stochastic integration, both based on $L^2$-arguments and approximations. One dealt with a standard Brownian motion as the only possible integrator and admitted integrands to be progressively measurable processes satisfying certain integrability conditions. The other theory I saw generalized the ideas of the first one to continuous semimartingales as integrators, but it "only" admitted predictable integrands (I write "only" as predictability implies progressive measurability). Skimming through the literature I get the impression that using predictable integrands is quite common. Is there a deeper reason why on "restricts" oneself to this class of processes?
2025-01-13 00:00:08.1736726408
Why predictable processes?
3.4k Views Asked by JohnSmith https://math.techqa.club/user/johnsmith/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in STOCHASTIC-PROCESSES
- Prove that: $E[\int^{\tau}_{0} f(t)d\omega(t)]=0$ and $E\mid \int^{\tau}_{0} f(t)d\omega(t)\mid^2=E[\int^{\tau}_{0} f^2(t)dt]$.
- Understanding the Fluid limit model in Queueing Theory
- Blackwell's example in Markov process theory and Kolmogorov's extension theorem
- Asymptotically unbiasedness of an weighted estimator
- Scaled limit of non-independent sequence of random variables
- Is there a better way to determine $E(X_{n+1}|X_{n})$ for this problem?
- Expectation of the product of two dependent binomial random variable
- Minimum distribution of random walk for $p > \frac{1}{2}$
- Compute Fourier Transform using conditional expectation
- Sigma algebra of cylinder events (stochastic processes)
Related Questions in STOCHASTIC-CALCULUS
- Prove that: $E[\int^{\tau}_{0} f(t)d\omega(t)]=0$ and $E\mid \int^{\tau}_{0} f(t)d\omega(t)\mid^2=E[\int^{\tau}_{0} f^2(t)dt]$.
- SDE solution with $\mu_t$ a bounded integral
- laplace transform of smirnov density, i.e. how to calculate this integral?
- Solving a Stochastic PDE with two variables in time
- Why isn't this stochastic integral trivial?
- Proving linearity of a subspace of $L^2$
- How to obtain this result using Ito's Lemma?
- Using Fubini's Theorem in Stochastic Calculus
- predictable process in continuous times.
- Why for a continous local martingale ,on an enlarged probability space, it possibly holds that $M_t=B_{\langle M \rangle _t}$
Related Questions in FINANCE
- How to Calculate an Import to Receive considering Fees.
- how much is invested at each rate?
- Put and Call options, Financial derivative
- Show that the interest rate sequence is Cauchy
- Question about creating $2\times 2$ covariance matrix with call option?
- Solving a Stochastic PDE with two variables in time
- Finding an approximation for $E[Y ] − e^{\mu}$?
- Solving a system of equations - minimizing f
- About the denominator in the future value formula
- how to calculate compound interest when year is not whole?
Related Questions in STOCHASTIC-INTEGRALS
- Solving a Stochastic PDE with two variables in time
- How can I formally arrive at solution of "deterministic SDE"
- Why isn't this stochastic integral trivial?
- Why predictable processes?
- Construction of the Itō integral with (local) martingales as integrators
- Complete (not heurestic) proof of Ito lemma?
- Distribution of sum of $n$ i.i.d. symmetric Pareto distributed random variables
- Can the integral of Brownian motion be expressed as a function of Brownian motion and time?
- Evaluating integral with respect to brownian motion
- Uniqueness in law associated to nonlinear SDEs
Related Questions in STOCHASTIC-ANALYSIS
- Complete orthonormal system of eigenfunctions for trace-class nonnegative operator on a Hilbert space
- Solving a Stochastic PDE with two variables in time
- Dominant and Monotone Convergence With Expectation
- Why for a continous local martingale ,on an enlarged probability space, it possibly holds that $M_t=B_{\langle M \rangle _t}$
- Is a martingale conditioned to return in the future a supermartingale?
- Canonical probability space for Brownian motion
- Can we find the boundary condition of a function of diffusion process?
- Weak convergence of stochastic integral
- Why predictable processes?
- How to calculate analytical solution to fokker planck equation in finite domain?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- A community project: prove (or disprove) that $\sum_{n\geq 1}\frac{\sin(2^n)}{n}$ is convergent
- Alternative way of expressing a quantied statement with "Some"
Popular # Hahtags
real-analysis
calculus
linear-algebra
probability
abstract-algebra
integration
sequences-and-series
combinatorics
general-topology
matrices
functional-analysis
complex-analysis
geometry
group-theory
algebra-precalculus
probability-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
limits
analysis
number-theory
measure-theory
elementary-number-theory
statistics
multivariable-calculus
functions
derivatives
discrete-mathematics
differential-geometry
inequality
trigonometry
Popular Questions
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- Difference between "≈", "≃", and "≅"
- Easy way of memorizing values of sine, cosine, and tangent
- How to calculate the intersection of two planes?
- What does "∈" mean?
- If you roll a fair six sided die twice, what's the probability that you get the same number both times?
- Probability of getting exactly 2 heads in 3 coins tossed with order not important?
- Fourier transform for dummies
- Limit of $(1+ x/n)^n$ when $n$ tends to infinity
Being predictable (as in being measurable with respect to the predictable $\sigma$-algebra) always implies being progressive (as in being measurable with respect to the progressive $\sigma$-algebra), but the other implication only holds in special cases, such as when e.g. the underlying filtration is the usual completion of the filtration generated by a Brownian motion.
There are good reasons for restricting yourself to predictable integrands. In general, stochastic integral processes with e.g. progressive integrands and local martingale integrators will not be local martingales (generally, such integrals will be difficult to define at all except for simple progressive integrands). For an example of this, let $N$ be a standard Poisson process and let $M_t = N_t - t$. Then $M$ is a local martingale (in fact, a true martingale).
We then have $$ \int_0^t N_s d M_s =\int_0^t N_{s-} dM_s +\int_0^t \Delta N_s d M_s \\ =\int_0^t N_{s-} dM_s + \sum_{0<s\le }(\Delta N_s)^2 =\int_0^t N_{s-} dM_s + N_t. $$ Here, the first term is a local martingale (because it's the integral of a left-continuous and adapted, hence predictable, process, with respect to a local martingale), while the second term is not a local martingale. Therefore, the integral $\int_0^t N_s d M_s$ is not a local martingale. In essence, the reason for this is that $N$ is progressive (because it is cadlag and adapted) but not predictable.
One of the main properties which makes it possible to obtain the local martingale property for stochastic integrals of predictable processes with respect to local martingales is the following result: If $X$ is cadlag and predictable, then the jumps of $X$ can be covered with a countable sequence of predictable stopping times. And predictable stopping times plays well with martingales.
For more on all this, see e.g. the books "Difffusions, Markov processes and martingales" by Rogers & Williams, or "Semimartingale theory and Stochastic Calculus" by He, Wang and Yan.