I'm trying to understand why we are searching roots of any equation at 0.
For example, $x^2 + 8x - 425 = 0$
The given equation has $2$ roots: $x_1 = -25$ and $x_2 = 17$. It means that the plot of the given function intersects $Ox$ at these points.
But why can't we search for $x$ arguments at 1 point for example. I mean, $x^2 + 8x - 425 = 1$. The roots will be different for the given function result with these arguments, but the function remains the same.
What I want to say, we can always find arguments for the given function result (that's why we can draw a plot of this function). There is always a match between arguments and function result. We can always make a correct numerical equality with different arguments (though the arguments won't be always integers).
Why roots are considered as roots only at the point where a plot intersects $Ox$?
Apologize if this is a simple question, seems like I missed that concept.
Well, if you want to find the intersection points between a parabola, $y= ax^2+bx+c$, with a line $y=dx+e$ (special case the horizontal line $y=d$, say $y=1$ as above), or another parabola, $y= fx^2+gx+h$, you just set the two equations equal:
$ax^2+bx+c = dx+e$ and $ax^2+bx+c=fx^2+gx+h$
and then set them zero:
$ax^2+(b-d)x+(c-e)=0$ and $(a-f)x^2+(b-g)x+(c-h)=0$.
Then you have to determine the roots of these equations.