I saw in the article Alt, H. M. and Caffarelli, L. A. Existence and regularity for a minimum problem with free boundary. J. Reine Angew. Math., 325, (1981), 105–144. That the functional \begin{equation} J(v):= \int_{\Omega}(|\nabla v|^{2} + \chi(\{v>0\})Q^2) \end{equation} is not differentiable. Why this functional isn't differentiable? My difficulty in this question is because I do not know exactly what means that the functional is differentiable. So if you can explain, what is a differentiable functional, or to say in what sense this specific functional isn't differentiable I will be very grateful. Above $\chi$ denotes the characteristic function, this $\chi(A)(x) = 1 $ if $x \in A$ and $0$ if $x \notin A.$, and $Q(x)$ is non-negative and measurable.
2026-05-06 05:13:36.1778044416
Why this functional isn't differentiable?
147 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ANALYSIS
- Analytical solution of a nonlinear ordinary differential equation
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Show that $d:\mathbb{C}\times\mathbb{C}\rightarrow[0,\infty[$ is a metric on $\mathbb{C}$.
- conformal mapping and rational function
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Proving whether function-series $f_n(x) = \frac{(-1)^nx}n$
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Proving smoothness for a sequence of functions.
- How to prove that $E_P(\frac{dQ}{dP}|\mathcal{G})$ is not equal to $0$
- Integral of ratio of polynomial
Related Questions in PARTIAL-DIFFERENTIAL-EQUATIONS
- PDE Separation of Variables Generality
- Partial Derivative vs Total Derivative: Function depending Implicitly and Explicitly on Variable
- Transition from theory of PDEs to applied analysis and industrial problems and models with PDEs
- Harmonic Functions are Analytic Evan’s Proof
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- How might we express a second order PDE as a system of first order PDE's?
- Inhomogeneous biharmonic equation on $\mathbb{R}^d$
- PDE: Determine the region above the $x$-axis for which there is a classical solution.
- Division in differential equations when the dividing function is equal to $0$
Related Questions in DEFINITION
- How are these definitions of continuous relations equivalent?
- If a set is open, does it mean that every point is an interior point?
- What does $a^b$ mean in the definition of a cartesian closed category?
- $\lim_{n\to \infty}\sum_{j=0}^{[n/2]} \frac{1}{n} f\left( \frac{j}{n}\right)$
- Definition of "Normal topological space"
- How to verify $(a,b) = (c,d) \implies a = c \wedge b = d$ naively
- Why wolfram alpha assumed $ x>0$ as a domain of definition for $x^x $?
- Showing $x = x' \implies f(x) = f(x')$
- Inferior limit when t decreases to 0
- Is Hilbert space a Normed Space or a Inner Product Space? Or it have to be both at the same time?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
A functional is differentiable if it has a derivative. There are two popular kinds of derivative:
Accordingly, afunctional may be Fréchet differentiable or Gâteaux differentiable, the former property being stronger than the latter.
The functional $F(v) = \int_\Omega |\nabla v|^2$ is Fréchet differentiable on $W^{1,2}(\Omega)$. Its derivative at point $v\in W^{1,2}(\Omega)$ is given by $$ (D_v F)(\phi)=2\int_\Omega\nabla v\cdot \nabla \phi,\quad \phi\in W^{1,2}(\Omega) \tag1 $$ where you should understand that the derivative $ D_v F $ is a linear functional given by (1). The verification that $D_v F$ meets the definition of Fréchet derivative is below: $$\begin{split} F(v+\phi ) &=\int_\Omega |\nabla v+\nabla \phi|^2=\int_\Omega |\nabla v|^2+2 \int_\Omega\nabla v\cdot \nabla \phi + \int_\Omega |\nabla \phi|^2 \\ & = F(v)+(D_vF)(\phi)+ O(\|\phi\|^2) \end{split}$$
However, the second term $G(v)=\int_{v>0} Q^2$ is not even Gâteaux differentiable. Let $v\equiv 0$ and $\phi\equiv 1$. Then the restriction of $G$ to the line $\{v+t\phi:t\in\mathbb R\}$ is $$G(v+t\phi)=\begin{cases} \int_\Omega Q^2 \quad &\text{if } t>0 \\ 0\quad &\text{if } t\le 0\end{cases} $$ which is not even continuous, let alone differentiable.