Let $X_i$ be a uniformly bounded net in $B(H)$, the set of all bounded linear operators on a hilbert space $H$. $P_i$ is a net of projections increasing to $1$. For any $j> i$, we have $X_i =P_i X_j P_i$. So, can I say that $X_i$ converges in the strong operator topology? I saw similar assertion in one paper without explanation.
2026-03-25 01:38:04.1774402684
$X_i =P_i X_j P_i$ implies that $X_i$ converges in SOT?
68 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
Related Questions in OPERATOR-THEORY
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Confusion about relationship between operator $K$-theory and topological $K$-theory
- Definition of matrix valued smooth function
- hyponormal operators
- a positive matrix of operators
- If $S=(S_1,S_2)$ hyponormal, why $S_1$ and $S_2$ are hyponormal?
- Closed kernel of a operator.
- Why is $\lambda\mapsto(\lambda\textbf{1}-T)^{-1}$ analytic on $\rho(T)$?
- Show that a sequence of operators converges strongly to $I$ but not by norm.
- Is the dot product a symmetric or anti-symmetric operator?
Related Questions in OPERATOR-ALGEBRAS
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- hyponormal operators
- Cuntz-Krieger algebra as crossed product
- Identifying $C(X\times X)$ with $C(X)\otimes C(X)$
- If $A\in\mathcal{L}(E)$, why $\lim\limits_{n\to+\infty}\|A^n\|^{1/n}$ always exists?
- Given two projections $p,q$ in a C$^{*}$-algebra $E$, find all irreducible representations of $C^{*}(p,q)$
- projective and Haagerup tensor norms
- AF-algebras and K-theory
- How to show range of a projection is an eigenspace.
- Is $\left\lVert f_U-f_V\right\rVert_{op}\leq \left\lVert U-V\right\rVert_2$ where $f_U = A\mapsto UAU^*$?
Related Questions in VON-NEUMANN-ALGEBRAS
- An embedding from the $C(X) \rtimes_{\alpha,r}\Gamma$ into $L^{\infty}(X) \ltimes \Gamma$.
- Are atomic simple C*-algebras von Neumann algebras?
- weak operator topology convergence and the trace of spectral projections
- Reference request for the following theorem in Von Neumann algebras.
- Is the bidual of a C*-algebra isomorphic to the universal enveloping von Nemann algebra as a Banach algebra?
- von Neumann algebra
- L2 norm convergence on (bounded ball of) *-subalgebra of von Neumann algebra
- Traces on $K(H)$
- Why is $M_n(A)$ a von Neumann algebra
- Clarification on proof in Murphy's C*-algebras
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I found a possible answer. Since $X_i$ is uniformly bounded in $B(H)$, it follows that there is a subnet of $\{X_i\}$ converging to $X\in B(H)$ in WOT. We assert that $ X_i =P_i X P_i$ for every $i$. Indeed, for every $i$, we can find a subnet $\{X_{i_k}\}$ of the subnet such that $i_k \ge i$ for every $k$. Since $\{X_{i_k}\}$ converging to $X$ in WOT, it follows that $\{P_iX_{i_k}P_i\}$ converging to $P_iXP_i$ in WOT. Note that $P_iX_{i_k}P_i = X_i$ for every $k$. We obtain that $X_i =P_i X P_i$.
Now, we only need to show that $X_i \rightarrow X$ in SOT. Since $X_i =P_i X P_i$, we have $$\|(X_i -X)\eta\|_H = \|(P_i X P_i -X)\eta\|_H \le \|(P_i X P_i - P_iX)\eta\|_H +\|(P_i X -X)\eta\|_H \le \|P_iX\|_\infty \|(P_i - 1)\eta\|_H + \|(P_i - 1)X\eta\|_H .$$ Note that $\|P_iX\|_\infty \le \|X\|_\infty <\infty.$ We obtain that $\|(X_i -X)\eta\|_H \rightarrow_i 0$.