The following picture shows the statement of the theorem and the first part of Evans' proof.
In his prove, Evans defines an operater A, which I know is properly defined (because of the maximum principle) and is linear on X, but what I don't understand is why A is compact. At first I thought it should use compact embedding like in section 6.2, but seems it's not the case, and I don't know what is the norm of space X as the intersection of two banach space. Any help is appreciated.
2026-03-26 14:22:34.1774534954
A detail in Evans's prove of THEOREM 3 in section 6.5 (about principal eigenvalue)
84 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PARTIAL-DIFFERENTIAL-EQUATIONS
- PDE Separation of Variables Generality
- Partial Derivative vs Total Derivative: Function depending Implicitly and Explicitly on Variable
- Transition from theory of PDEs to applied analysis and industrial problems and models with PDEs
- Harmonic Functions are Analytic Evan’s Proof
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- How might we express a second order PDE as a system of first order PDE's?
- Inhomogeneous biharmonic equation on $\mathbb{R}^d$
- PDE: Determine the region above the $x$-axis for which there is a classical solution.
- Division in differential equations when the dividing function is equal to $0$
Related Questions in SOBOLEV-SPACES
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- $\mbox{Cap}_p$-measurability
- If $u\in W^{1,p}(\Omega )$ is s.t. $\nabla u=0$ then $u$ is constant a.e.
- Weak formulation of Robin boundary condition problem
- Variational Formulation - inhomogeneous Neumann boundary
- Why the Sobolev space $W^{1,2}(M,N)$ weak-sequencially closed in $W^{1,2}(\mathbb R^K)$?
- Sobolev space $H^s(Q)$ is Hilbert
- Duhamel's principle for heat equation.
- How to define discrete Sobolev dual norm so that it can be computed?
- Weakly sequentially continuous maps
Related Questions in ELLIPTIC-EQUATIONS
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
- Definition of constant coefficient elliptic operator
- Weak formulation of Robin boundary condition problem
- Harmonic functions satisfying given inequality
- How to get the equation of an ellipse given the center, directrix and length of latus rectum?
- Regularity of the Divergence of Weak Solutions to Elliptic PDEs
- Showing that a function is harmonic
- Define a "Neumann" trace of a harmonic function on bounded domain
- How to determine if elliptic equation comes from variational problem?
- What is the parametric equation of a rotated Ellipse (given the angle of rotation)
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I realized that I have ignored the simple fact that $X=H^m(U)\cap H_0^1(U)$ is a closed subspace of $H^m(U)$: for a sequence $\{f_n\}\subset X$ converge to $f$ in $H^m(U)$, $\{f_n\}$ also converge in $H^1(U)$ and since $H_0^1(U)$ is a closed subspace of $H^1(U)$, $f\in X$. So the norm of X should be $H^m(U)$-norm.
Now we proof $A$ is compact. Let $\{f_n\}\subset X$ be a bounded sequance. Use the estimate in Thoerem 5 of section 6.3, we have $$ \Vert Af_n\Vert_{H^{m+2}(U)}\leq C_1(\Vert f_n\Vert_{H^{m}(U)}+\Vert Af_n\Vert_{L^2(U)}) $$ Moreover, by the theorem "boundness of inverse" in section 6.2, we have $\Vert Af_n\Vert_{L^2(U)}\leq C\Vert f_n\Vert_{L^2(U)}$ for some constant $C$. So we can deduce $\{Af_n\}$ is bounded in $H^{m+2}(U)$, what left is to show that a bounded sequence in $H^{m+2}(U)$ has subsequence converge in $H^m(U)$.
To prove this statement, we apply induction to $m$. Suppose the conclusion is true for natural number $k$ not larger than m. For $k=m+1$, Let $\{f_n\}\subset X$ be a bounded sequence in $H^{k+2}(U)=H^{m+3}(U)$, then by induction hypothesis, $\{f_n\}$ has subsequence $\{f_{n_k}\}$ converge in $H^m(U)$. For $\alpha$ satisfy $|\alpha|=m+1$, $\{D^{\alpha}f_{n_k}\}\subset H^2(U)\subset H^1(U)$ is bounded, since $H^1(U)$ can be compactly embedded in $L^2(U)$, we know $\{D^{\alpha}f_{n_k}\}$ converge in $L^2(U)$. Then $\{f_{n_k}\}$ is a Cauchy sequence in $H^{m+1}(U)$ and we have proved the conclusion for $k = m+1$. $\square$