Let $A$ be a commutative Artin ring, $M$ be a finitely generated $A$-module. Then are there only finitely many submodules of $M$ up to isomorphism? For example, when $A$ is a field, it is true. But I don't know the general case.
2026-03-26 01:09:40.1774487380
A module has only finite many submodule up to isomorphism
135 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in COMMUTATIVE-ALGEBRA
- Jacobson radical = nilradical iff every open set of $\text{Spec}A$ contains a closed point.
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Tensor product commutes with infinite products
- Example of simple modules
- Describe explicitly a minimal free resolution
- Ideals of $k[[x,y]]$
- $k[[x,y]]/I$ is a Gorenstein ring implies that $I$ is generated by 2 elements
- There is no ring map $\mathbb C[x] \to \mathbb C[x]$ swapping the prime ideals $(x-1)$ and $(x)$
- Inclusions in tensor products
- Principal Ideal Ring which is not Integral
Related Questions in MODULES
- Idea to make tensor product of two module a module structure
- $(2,1+\sqrt{-5}) \not \cong \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ as $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$-module
- Example of simple modules
- $R$ a domain subset of a field $K$. $I\trianglelefteq R$, show $I$ is a projective $R$-module
- $S_3$ action on the splitting field of $\mathbb{Q}[x]/(x^3 - x - 1)$
- idempotent in quiver theory
- Isomorphism of irreducible R-modules
- projective module which is a submodule of a finitely generated free module
- Exercise 15.10 in Cox's Book (first part)
- direct sum of injective hull of two modules is equal to the injective hull of direct sum of those modules
Related Questions in ARTINIAN
- $M$ finitely generated over $(R,\mathfrak{m})\Rightarrow M/\mathfrak{m}M$ artinian
- Primary ideals in an Artinial local ring
- Primary decomposition in a finite algebra
- Projectivity of a module
- Maximal and prime ideal in an artinian ring
- Example of a module that is finitely generated, finitely cogenerated and linearly compact, but not Artinian!
- If M is a a left module over $M_n(D)$ where $D$ is a division ring, M is Noetherian iff Artinian
- Checking if quotient ring is Noetherian or Artinian over a module
- Infinite Artin ring with only finitely many units
- Question about Hopkins-Levitzki Theorem's proof
Related Questions in MODULE-ISOMORPHISM
- Is the bidual of a C*-algebra isomorphic to the universal enveloping von Nemann algebra as a Banach algebra?
- $\ell(M/N) \leq \ell(M)$ if $M$ is an $A$-module
- Ring, but not a field.
- Are the $k[x]$-modules $M = k[x]/\langle x + 1 \rangle \oplus k[x]/\langle x + 1 \rangle $ and $N = k[x]/\langle (x + 1)^2 \rangle$ isomorphic?
- Do we have $R\simeq S$ for two submodules $R,S$ of $A^n$?
- Is $R$ finitely generated?
- FOL - If two models agree on every sentence are they isomorphic?
- Showing that $\frac{\mathbb{R}[x]}{\langle x \rangle}$ and $\frac{\mathbb{R}[x]}{\langle x-1 \rangle}$ are not isomorphic as $\mathbb{R}[x]$ modules.
- Are two submodules (where one is contained in the other) isomorphic if their quotientmodules are isomorphic?
- A problem about checking isomorphism of R-module
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
It is possible for a finitely generated $A$-module to have infinitely many submodules up to isomorphism.
Let $k$ be an infinite field, and let $A = k\langle x,y \rangle/(x^2, y^2, xy, yx)$. Then $A$ is a $k$-algebra and is finite-dimensional over $k$, so it is an Artin ring. Consider the (unique up to isomorphism) indecomposable injective $A$-module $I$: it is a $3$-dimensional $k$-vector space on which the actions of $x$ and $y$ are defined by the matrices $$ I_x = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}, I_y = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 \end{bmatrix}. $$ Next, for each $\lambda\in k$, define an $A$-module $M_\lambda$ as a $2$-dimensional $k$-vector space with action of $x$ and $y$ defined by $$ M_{\lambda, x} = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 \end{bmatrix}, M_{\lambda,y} = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \\ \lambda & 0 \end{bmatrix}. $$ Then the $M_\lambda$ are pairwise non-isomorphic; to see this, simply note that if $X = PM_{\lambda,x}P^{-1}$ and $Y=PM_{\lambda,y}P^{-1}$ are simultaneous conjugates of the matrices $M_{\lambda,x}$ and $M_{\lambda,y}$, then they satisfy $\lambda X - Y = 0$ and $\mu X - Y \neq 0$ for any $\mu \neq \lambda$. Also, each $M_\lambda$ is isomorphic to a submodule of $I$, as the embedding of $k^2$ into $k^3$ given by the matrix $$ \iota_\lambda:\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ \lambda & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix} $$ is such that $\iota_\lambda \circ M_{\lambda,x} = I_x \circ \iota_{\lambda}$ and $\iota_\lambda \circ M_{\lambda,y} = I_y \circ \iota_{\lambda}$, so it defines a monomorphism of $A$-modules. Since $k$ is infinite, this proves the assertion.