Suppose that $D, E$ are two division rings in the Brauer group of $F$ ($Br(F)$), where $F$ is local field. Show that $D\otimes_FE$ is a division ring iff $([D:F],[E:F])=1$.
2026-03-26 04:51:24.1774500684
A problem in division rings and Brauer group
244 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ABSTRACT-ALGEBRA
- Feel lost in the scheme of the reducibility of polynomials over $\Bbb Z$ or $\Bbb Q$
- Integral Domain and Degree of Polynomials in $R[X]$
- Fixed points of automorphisms of $\mathbb{Q}(\zeta)$
- Group with order $pq$ has subgroups of order $p$ and $q$
- A commutative ring is prime if and only if it is a domain.
- Conjugacy class formula
- Find gcd and invertible elements of a ring.
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- polynomial remainder theorem proof, is it legit?
- $(2,1+\sqrt{-5}) \not \cong \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ as $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$-module
Related Questions in RING-THEORY
- Jacobson radical = nilradical iff every open set of $\text{Spec}A$ contains a closed point.
- A commutative ring is prime if and only if it is a domain.
- Find gcd and invertible elements of a ring.
- Prove that $R[x]$ is an integral domain if and only if $R$ is an integral domain.
- Prove that $Z[i]/(5)$ is not a field. Check proof?
- If $P$ is a prime ideal of $R[x;\delta]$ such as $P\cap R=\{0\}$, is $P(Q[x;\delta])$ also prime?
- Let $R$ be a simple ring having a minimal left ideal $L$. Then every simple $R$-module is isomorphic to $L$.
- A quotient of a polynomial ring
- Does a ring isomorphism between two $F$-algebras must be a $F$-linear transformation
- Prove that a ring of fractions is a local ring
Related Questions in TENSOR-PRODUCTS
- Tensor product commutes with infinite products
- Inclusions in tensor products
- How to prove that $f\otimes g: V\otimes W\to X\otimes Y$ is a monomorphism
- What does a direct sum of tensor products look like?
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
- Tensor modules of tensor algebras
- projective and Haagerup tensor norms
- Algebraic Tensor product of Hilbert spaces
- Why $\displaystyle\lim_{n\to+\infty}x_n\otimes y_n=x\otimes y\;?$
- Proposition 3.7 in Atiyah-Macdonald (Tensor product of fractions is fraction of tensor product)
Related Questions in DIVISION-ALGEBRAS
- The dimension of a division ring over its center is square.
- Prove that the homomorphism $\phi:R\to S^{-1}R$ is injective if and only if $S$ contains no zero-divisors.
- Why does the multiplication in a division algebra depends on every component?
- Degree $n$ extension of local field splits degree $n$ division algebra
- Galois theory for (non-commutative) division rings
- Conditions for equivalent definitions of division algebra
- Existence of division algebras with center $\mathbb{Q}$ of prime degree
- Finite dimensional central division $\mathbb K$-algebra as a subalgebra of a matrix $\mathbb K$-algebra
- How to construction a division ring from the given field?
- The ring generated over the center of a division ring by a group.
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Some hints:
1) The implication $[D:F], [E:F]$ relatively prime implies $D \otimes_F E$ is a division algebra has nothing to do with $F$ being local: it is true (and is a very standard fact) for finite dimensional central division algebras over an arbitrary field.
Without knowing what your background in this subject is it will be hard to sketch out an answer that will necessarily be helpful to you, but here is one way to go that may or may not be accessible to you: you want to show that the index of $A := D \otimes_F E$ is equal to the product of the indices of $D$ and $E$. Thus if $d = \sqrt{[D:F]}$ and $e = \sqrt{[E:F]}$, you want to show that the index of $A$ is $de$. For this, it suffices to show that $A$ is not split by any field extension of degree prime to $d$ and is not split by any field extension of degree prime to $e$. And that's easy: after making a field extension $L/K$ of degree prime to $d$, the period of $D_{/L}$ is still divisible by $d$, and the period of $E_{/L}$ is still prime to $d$...
2) Here you do need to use that the Brauer group of a local field is $\mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z}$. I would also like to use that the period and index are equal in the Brauer group of a local field (which follows from the "standard fact" that the restriction map on Brauer groups induced by a degree $d$ extension of local fields is multiplication by $d$). And if you know these things, the result is not hard: really we are saying something like: since $6$ and $4$ are not relatively prime, the order of $\frac{1}{6} + \frac{1}{4}$ in $\mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z}$ is smaller than $24$.