Suppose $A,B$ are symmetric, positive semi-definite matrices of same order such that $A \preceq B \preceq \kappa A$. How to prove that this is equivalent to $\frac{1}{\kappa}A^+ \preceq B^+ \preceq A^+$? Here $A^+$ is the generalized inverse of $A$.
2026-03-18 02:18:13.1773800293
A question on positive semi definite matrices
414 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in MATRICES
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Powers of a simple matrix and Catalan numbers
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Particular commutator matrix is strictly lower triangular, or at least annihilates last base vector
- Inverse of a triangular-by-block $3 \times 3$ matrix
- Form square matrix out of a non square matrix to calculate determinant
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Eiegenspectrum on subtracting a diagonal matrix
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
Related Questions in POSITIVE-SEMIDEFINITE
- Minimization of a convex quadratic form
- set of positive definite matrices are the interior of set of positive semidefinite matrices
- How to solve for $L$ in $X = LL^T$?
- How the principal submatrix of a PSD matrix could be positive definite?
- Hadamard product of a positive semidefinite matrix with a negative definite matrix
- The square root of a positive semidefinite matrix
- Optimization of the sum of a convex and a non-convex function?
- Proving that a particular set is full dimensional.
- Finding bounds for a subset of the positive semidefinite cone
- Showing a matrix is positive (semi) definite
Related Questions in GENERALIZED-INVERSE
- Generalized inverse matrix rules
- Does $ 0 \leq A \leq B \implies 0\leq B^\dagger \leq A^\dagger$?
- Trace inequality for a product of p.s.d. matrices and their pseudo inverse.
- $A \in \mathbb{C}^{m\times n}$,$A=FG^*$ and $r(A)=r(F)=r(G)$. Prove $A^\dagger = G(F^*AG)^{-1}F^*$ and $A^\dagger = (G^\dagger)^*F^\dagger$
- Generalized Inverse of GA & J
- Invertibility modulo the intersection of ideals in $C^*$-algebras
- Generalized Inverse of Transpose
- Does $\operatorname{Tr}( (A+B)^ \dagger A) \leq k + \frac{1}{\lambda_{k+1} (B)}\operatorname{Tr}(A)$ for $A$, $B$ sdp and $k \in \mathbb N$?
- How to understand quasi-inverse of a function f∘g∘f = f?
- Is the generalized inverse of the gen. inverse of $f$ equal to $f$?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
If $A^+$ is in particular the Moore Penrose inverse, then we can proceed as follows: There exists an orthogonal matrix $U$ such that $$ \tilde A = U^TAU = \pmatrix{A_0 & 0\\0 & 0} $$ where $A_0$ is invertible (i.e. strictly positive definite). We now have $$ A \preceq B \preceq \kappa A \implies\\ \tilde A \preceq \tilde B \preceq \kappa \tilde A \implies\\ U^TAU \preceq U^TBU \preceq \kappa U^TAU \implies\\ \pmatrix{A_0 & 0\\0 & 0} \preceq \pmatrix{B_{11} & B_{12}\\B_{21} & B_{22}} \preceq \kappa \pmatrix{A_0 & 0\\0 & 0} $$ Now, from the right-side inequality, we have $$ \pmatrix{A_0 & 0\\0 & 0} - \pmatrix{B_{11} & B_{12}\\B_{21} & B_{22}} = \pmatrix{A_0 - \kappa B_{11} & -B_{12}\\ -B_{21} & -B_{22}} \succeq 0 \tag{RHS} $$ and from the left-side inequality, we have $$ \pmatrix{B_{11} & B_{12}\\B_{21} & B_{22}} - \pmatrix{A_0 & 0\\0 & 0} = \pmatrix{B_{11} - A_0 & B_{12}\\ B_{21} & B_{22}} \succeq 0 \tag{LHS} $$ Now, since any principal submatrix of a positive semidefinite matrix is also positive semidefinite, we have $B_{22} \succeq 0$ and $-B_{22} \succeq 0$, which must mean that $B_{22} = 0$. Since $\tilde B$ is positive semidefinite, we have $$ \pmatrix{x^T & y^T} \pmatrix{B_{11} & B_{12}\\B_{21} & 0}\pmatrix{x\\y} \geq 0 \implies\\ x^TBx - 2x^TB_{12}y \geq 0 $$ Noting that the above must hold for all choices of $x,y \in \Bbb R^n$, conclude that $x^TB_{12} = 0$ for all $x \in \Bbb R^n$, which is to say that $B_{12} = B_{21}^T = 0$. Thus, we have $$ \tilde B = U^TBU = \pmatrix{B_{11} & 0\\0 & 0} $$ Now, it suffices to show that $\tilde A^+ \preceq \tilde B^+ \preceq \kappa \tilde A^+$. To that effect, note that $$ A_0 \preceq B_{11} \preceq \kappa A_0 $$ is an inequality of strictly positive definite matrices. Thus, we have $$ A_0^{-1} \succeq B_{11}^{-1} \succeq (\kappa A_0)^{-1} = \frac 1 \kappa A_0^{-1} $$ Finally, we have $$ \frac 1{\kappa}\tilde A^+ = \pmatrix{\frac 1 \kappa A_0^{-1} & 0\\0 & 0} \preceq \tilde B^+ = \pmatrix{B_{11}^{-1} & 0\\0 &0} \preceq \tilde A^+ = \pmatrix{A_0^{-1} & 0\\0 & 0} $$ Thus, we can reach the desired conclusion. In particular: $$ \frac 1{\kappa} A^+ = U[\frac 1{\kappa}\tilde A^+]U^T \preceq \tilde B^+ = UB^+U^T \preceq A^+ = U\tilde A^+ U^T $$
Regarding the comment:
Proof: Note that $$ A \preceq B \implies\\ B^{-1/2}AB^{-1/2} \preceq I \implies\\ \text{all eigenvalues of } B^{-1/2}AB^{-1/2} \text{ are less than } 1 \implies\\ \text{all eigenvalues of } [B^{-1/2}AB^{-1/2}]^{-1} \text{ are more than } 1 \implies\\ B^{1/2}A^{-1}B^{1/2} \succeq I \implies\\ A^{-1} \succeq B^{-1} $$