Let $(\Omega,\mathcal A,\operatorname P)$ be a probability space, $\tau:\Omega\to\Omega$ be a measurable map on $(\Omega,\mathcal A)$ with $\operatorname P\circ\:\tau^{-1}=\operatorname P$ and $X:\Omega\to\overline{\mathbb R}$ be $\mathcal A$-measurable with $$X\circ\tau\le X\;\;\;\operatorname P\text{-almost surely}\tag1.$$ I would like to conclude $$X\circ\tau=X\;\;\;\operatorname P\text{-almost surely}\tag2.$$ I assume that this is somehow almost trivial, but I can't figure out how we need to approach it. Maybe by showing that $\{X\circ\tau\ge X\}$ has probability $1$ or by showing that $\{X\circ\tau<X\}$ is a null set?
2026-04-07 00:20:00.1775521200
A subinvariant random variable is already invariant
44 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PROBABILITY-THEORY
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- What's $P(A_1\cap A_2\cap A_3\cap A_4) $?
- Another application of the Central Limit Theorem
- proving Kochen-Stone lemma...
- Is there a contradiction in coin toss of expected / actual results?
- Sample each point with flipping coin, what is the average?
- Random variables coincide
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- Determine the marginal distributions of $(T_1, T_2)$
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
Related Questions in MEASURE-THEORY
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- I can't undestand why $ \{x \in X : f(x) > g(x) \} = \bigcup_{r \in \mathbb{Q}}{\{x\in X : f(x) > r\}\cap\{x\in X:g(x) < r\}} $
- Trace $\sigma$-algebra of a product $\sigma$-algebra is product $\sigma$-algebra of the trace $\sigma$-algebras
- Meaning of a double integral
- Random variables coincide
- Convergence in measure preserves measurability
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- $f\in L_{p_1}\cap L_{p_2}$ implies $f\in L_{p}$ for all $p\in (p_1,p_2)$
Related Questions in DYNAMICAL-SYSTEMS
- Stability of system of parameters $\kappa, \lambda$ when there is a zero eigenvalue
- Stability of stationary point $O(0,0)$ when eigenvalues are zero
- Determine $ \ a_{\max} \ $ and $ \ a_{\min} \ $ so that the above difference equation is well-defined.
- Question on designing a state observer for discrete time system
- How to analyze a dynamical system when $t\to\infty?$
- The system $x' = h(y), \space y' = ay + g(x)$ has no periodic solutions
- Existence of unique limit cycle for $r'=r(μ-r^2), \space θ' = ρ(r^2)$
- Including a time delay term for a differential equation
- Doubts in proof of topologically transitive + dense periodic points = Devaney Chaotic
- Condition for symmetric part of $A$ for $\|x(t)\|$ monotonically decreasing ($\dot{x} = Ax(t)$)
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Partial answer: Obviously, $$\{X>c\}\subseteq\tau^{-1}\left(\left\{X>c\right\}\right)\tag3$$ and hence (since $\operatorname P\circ\:\tau^{-1}=\operatorname P$) $$\operatorname P[X\le c<X\circ\tau]=\operatorname P\left[\tau^{-1}\left(\left\{X>c\right\}\right)\right]-\operatorname P[X>c]=0\tag4$$ for all $c\in\mathbb R$. I'm not sure whether I'm missing something or not, but we should be able to conclude $$\operatorname P[X<X\circ\tau]=\bigcup_{c\in\mathbb Q}\operatorname P[X\le c<X\circ\tau]=0\tag5.$$ Since, on the other hand, $\operatorname P[X\le X\circ\tau]=1$, this would yield $(2)$.