Is it true that $AA^T = BB^T$ always implies $A =BU $ for some unitary matrix $U$. Or there may exist other scenarios also? All matrices are real and square.
2026-03-25 09:24:06.1774430646
$AA^T = BB^T \rightarrow A =BU $
442 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MATRICES
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Powers of a simple matrix and Catalan numbers
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Particular commutator matrix is strictly lower triangular, or at least annihilates last base vector
- Inverse of a triangular-by-block $3 \times 3$ matrix
- Form square matrix out of a non square matrix to calculate determinant
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Eiegenspectrum on subtracting a diagonal matrix
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
Related Questions in MATRIX-EQUATIONS
- tensor differential equation
- Can it be proved that non-symmetric matrix $A$ will always have real eigen values?.
- Real eigenvalues of a non-symmetric matrix $A$ ?.
- How to differentiate sum of matrix multiplication?
- Do all 2-variable polynomials split into linear factors over the space of $2 \times 2$ complex matrices?
- Big picture discussion for iterative linear solvers?
- Matrix transformations, Eigenvectors and Eigenvalues
- Jordan chevaley decomposition and cyclic vectors
- If $A$ is a $5×4$ matrix and $B$ is a $4×5$ matrix
- Simplify $x^TA(AA^T+I)^{-1}A^Tx$
Related Questions in MATRIX-DECOMPOSITION
- Real eigenvalues of a non-symmetric matrix $A$ ?.
- Swapping row $n$ with row $m$ by using permutation matrix
- Block diagonalizing a Hermitian matrix
- $A \in M_n$ is reducible if and only if there is a permutation $i_1, ... , i_n$ of $1,... , n$
- Simplify $x^TA(AA^T+I)^{-1}A^Tx$
- Diagonalize real symmetric matrix
- How to solve for $L$ in $X = LL^T$?
- Q of the QR decomposition is an upper Hessenberg matrix
- Question involving orthogonal matrix and congruent matrices $P^{t}AP=I$
- Singular values by QR decomposition
Related Questions in TRANSPOSE
- Vectorization and transpose: how are $\text{vec}(W^T)$ and $\text{vec}(W)$ related?
- What can we say about two bases A and B for which the conversion matrix to a third base C is the transpose of the other
- Decomposition of the product of matrices
- Interpretation of transpose of a linear application from a matricial product point of view
- Derivative involving trace and Kronecker product
- What does a matrix multiplied by its transpose tell me about the matrix's inverse?
- Proving similarity of $A$ and $A^T$
- What does it mean when you say a matrix of of a linear transformation is relative to a standard basis?
- Matrix equation $Z - {}^t Z =c A Z$
- Prove that the characteristic polynmial of a skew mapping satisfies $c(-\lambda) = (-1)^n c(\lambda)$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
This should work in general, although I think it is overkill if $A$ and $B$ are invertible:
The entry at position $(i,j)$ of $AA^T$ is the scalar product of the $i$th row of $A$ with the $j$th row. So the equality of these matrices shows that these scalar products are always the same, both for the rows of $A$ and the rows of $B$. As the scalar product is bilinear, we can extend this result to sums and coefficients.
This gives us a linear map $$\varphi : rs(A) \to rs(B),$$ where $rs$ denotes the row space such that $\varphi$ is compatible with the scalar product. Using that the zero vector is the only vector of length $0$, you can show that $\varphi$ is bijective, i.e. an isometry.
Now using a real version of Witt's theorem, you can extend $\varphi$ to an isometry $\Phi$ on the whole space. But every isometry $\Phi$ on the whole space is given by an orthogonal matrix (or a unitary matrix with real entries if you want).