How lattice $L = V \otimes _k k[x] $ looks like? $L$ is free over $k[x]$ because $V$ is free over $k$ ; why this statement is true? Also I am trying to prove every unimodular $k[x]$ lattice has form $V \otimes _k k[x]$ how this fact is related to orthogonal basis ? How this statment looks like in matrix version?
2026-03-27 02:50:52.1774579852
About symmetric inner product space
95 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in COMMUTATIVE-ALGEBRA
- Jacobson radical = nilradical iff every open set of $\text{Spec}A$ contains a closed point.
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Tensor product commutes with infinite products
- Example of simple modules
- Describe explicitly a minimal free resolution
- Ideals of $k[[x,y]]$
- $k[[x,y]]/I$ is a Gorenstein ring implies that $I$ is generated by 2 elements
- There is no ring map $\mathbb C[x] \to \mathbb C[x]$ swapping the prime ideals $(x-1)$ and $(x)$
- Inclusions in tensor products
- Principal Ideal Ring which is not Integral
Related Questions in MODULES
- Idea to make tensor product of two module a module structure
- $(2,1+\sqrt{-5}) \not \cong \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ as $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$-module
- Example of simple modules
- $R$ a domain subset of a field $K$. $I\trianglelefteq R$, show $I$ is a projective $R$-module
- $S_3$ action on the splitting field of $\mathbb{Q}[x]/(x^3 - x - 1)$
- idempotent in quiver theory
- Isomorphism of irreducible R-modules
- projective module which is a submodule of a finitely generated free module
- Exercise 15.10 in Cox's Book (first part)
- direct sum of injective hull of two modules is equal to the injective hull of direct sum of those modules
Related Questions in PROJECTIVE-MODULE
- $R$ a domain subset of a field $K$. $I\trianglelefteq R$, show $I$ is a projective $R$-module
- projective module which is a submodule of a finitely generated free module
- Flat modules over a PID
- Projectivity of a module
- Proving a module is projective.
- Proving a specific module is projective.
- $M\otimes_A N\cong A$ implies $M$ is left $A$-projective?
- Proof of equivalence of two definitions of a projective module
- Problem based on Projective and Injective Module
- Splitting two exact sequences in a compatible way
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Proof.
$L$ is free because by choosing a basis $v_1,\ldots,v_n$ we get that $$V\cong k^n$$ for some $n$, so $$L=V\otimes_k k[x] \cong k^n\otimes_k k[x] \simeq k[x]^n.$$
Under this isomorphism the basis vectors for $L$ are $\ell_i=v_i\otimes 1$.
Now $B$ defines a bilinear form on $L$ by $\tilde{B}(v\otimes p,w\otimes q) = B(v,w)pq$.
Then $$\tilde{B}(\ell_i,\ell_j)=\tilde{B}(v_i\otimes 1,v_j\otimes_1)=B(v_i,v_j).$$ Thus $\det(\tilde{B}(\ell_i,\ell_j))=\det(B(v_i,v_j))$.
Every unimodular $k[x]$-lattice has this form
Edit: My prior "proof" had an error. This is what's proven in the Theorem in the OP.
Edit 2:
To show how the theorem in the question proves every unimodular lattice has this form we do the following.
Let $\ell_1,\ldots,\ell_n$ be the orthogonal $k[t]$ basis given by the theorem. Define $V=\{\sum_i c_i\ell_i : c_i\in k\}$ and define $B_0$ on $V$ by restricting $B$ to $V$. This is where we use orthogonality! The restriction is well-defined because the $\ell_i$ are orthogonal, so $B(\ell_i,\ell_j)=c_i\delta_{ij}$ for some constants $c_i\in k^\times$.
Then define $V\otimes_k k[t] \to L$ by $\ell_i\otimes p \mapsto p\ell_i$. Since the $\ell_i$ formed a $k[t]$ basis for $L$, this map is an isomorphism of $k[t]$ modules.
Then all we need to check is that the isomorphism sends $\tilde{B_0}$ to $B$. We do this by observing that $$\tilde{B_0}(\ell_i\otimes p,\ell_j\otimes q) = B_0(\ell_i,\ell_j)pq=B(\ell_i,\ell_j)pq=B(p\ell_i,q\ell_j),$$ as desired.